• The "Big Three" Linux companies ranked by Revenue, Employees, Kernel

    From LundukeJournal@1337:1/100 to All on Tue Apr 18 06:45:03 2023
    The "Big Three" Linux companies ranked by Revenue, Employees, Kernel Contributions

    Date:
    Tue, 18 Apr 2023 05:36:13 GMT

    Description:
    Red Hat, SUSE, & Canonical. Because stats and charts are fun.

    FULL STORY ======================================================================

    If somebody asks you, What is the biggest Linux company? You probably know
    the answer. Red Hat.

    But how big is Red Hat? How does it compare to other Linux companies? And how does that size translate into contributions to Linux, itself?

    What follows are some key statistics of what I call The Big Three Linux companies:

    Red Hat (Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Fedora)

    SUSE (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server)

    Canonical (Ubuntu)

    Using fancy-shmancy graphs. Because sometimes its nice to be able to visualize this sort of thing.

    Lets start with revenue (aka How much money they brought in).

    A few quick takeaways:

    WOW. Red Hat annual revenues are roughly 10 times that of SUSE . And over
    32 times that of Canonical .

    Annual revenue for all three companies increased significantly between 2020 and 2021.

    Note: The Red Hat revenue does not include revenue from its parent company (IBM). Likewise SUSE revenue doe not include revenue related to its primary owner (EQT).

    Now. Lets look at the total number of employees at each company.

    All three companies are sizable, in terms of staff. Roughly the same ratio
    as with revenue (which you would expect).

    Red Hat has close to 8 times the manpower as SUSE. And over 31 times Canonical.

    But how does that manpower translate into work getting done on upstream projects? Lets look at the most obvious project one that they all have a significant interest in the Linux Kernel itself.

    Its worth noting that all three companies have their own open source projects they develop and, to varying degrees, they also contribute other upstream projects. But Linux they all need Linux.

    Note the question marks there for Canonical. The reality is Canonical did
    not contribute a significant, measurable number of changes to either of the last two major Linux Kernel versions.

    Is it possible that the Canonical percentage could be as high as 0.1 or 0.2%?
    Maybe. Regardless, the number is incredibly small. Which is pretty consistent for Canonical. You certainly wont find Canonical on any Top 10 lists of Kernel Contributors. Or top 20 lists or top you get the idea.

    The other big takeaway is how impressive the Linux Kernel contributions are from SUSE.

    SUSE has roughly 1/8th the total number of employees as Red Hat yet manages
    to pull off roughly 1/2 the number of Linux Kernel changesets.

    Thats darned impressive.

    Regardless. Both are contributing more to the Linux Kernel than Canonical. Share Subscribe now

    So many reasons to subscribe to The Lunduke Journal of Technology . Nerdy articles & podcasts every week. Plus

    A dozen eBooks Monthly PDF Magazine Premium Videos

    Other handy links:

    The Lunduke Journal of Technology Community Site

    The Lunduke Journal of Technology Podcast RSS Feed

    The Lunduke Journal of Technology Podcast on iTunes

    The Lunduke Journal of Technology Podcast on Spotify

    On Twitter (@LundukeJournal



    ======================================================================
    Link to news story: https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-big-three-linux-companies-ranked


    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)