• New calculation refines comparison of ma

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Thu Sep 17 21:30:36 2020
    New calculation refines comparison of matter with antimatter
    Theorists publish improved prediction for the tiny difference in kaon
    decays observed by experiments

    Date:
    September 17, 2020
    Source:
    DOE/Brookhaven National Laboratory
    Summary:
    An international collaboration of theoretical physicists
    has published a new calculation relevant to the search for an
    explanation of the predominance of matter over antimatter in our
    universe. The new calculation gives a more accurate prediction for
    the likelihood with which kaons decay into a pair of electrically
    charged pions vs. a pair of neutral pions.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    An international collaboration of theoretical physicists -- including scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven
    National Laboratory (BNL) and the RIKEN-BNL Research Center (RBRC) -- has published a new calculation relevant to the search for an explanation
    of the predominance of matter over antimatter in our universe. The collaboration, known as RBC- UKQCD, also includes scientists from CERN
    (the European particle physics laboratory), Columbia University, the
    University of Connecticut, the University of Edinburgh, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Regensburg, and the University
    of Southampton. They describe their result in a paper to be published in
    the journal Physical Review D and has been highlighted as an "editor's suggestion."

    ========================================================================== Scientists first observed a slight difference in the behavior of matter
    and antimatter -- known as a violation of "CP symmetry" -- while studying
    the decays of subatomic particles called kaons in a Nobel Prize winning experiment at Brookhaven Lab in 1963. While the Standard Model of particle physics was pieced together soon after that, understanding whether the
    observed CP violation in kaon decays agreed with the Standard Model has
    proved elusive due to the complexity of the required calculations.

    The new calculation gives a more accurate prediction for the likelihood
    with which kaons decay into a pair of electrically charged pions vs. a
    pair of neutral pions. Understanding these decays and comparing the
    prediction with more recent state-of-the-art experimental measurements
    made at CERN and DOE's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory gives
    scientists a way to test for tiny differences between matter and
    antimatter, and search for effects that cannot be explained by the
    Standard Model.

    The new calculation represents a significant improvement over the group's previous result, published in Physical Review Letters in 2015. Based
    on the Standard Model, it gives a range of values for what is called
    "direct CP symmetry violation" in kaon decays that is consistent with the experimentally measured results. That means the observed CP violation
    is now, to the best of our knowledge, explained by the Standard Model,
    but the uncertainty in the prediction needs to be further improved since
    there is also an opportunity to reveal any sources of matter/antimatter asymmetry lying beyond the current theory's description of our world.

    "An even more accurate theoretical calculation of the Standard Model may
    yet lie outside of the experimentally measured range. It is therefore
    of great importance that we continue our progress, and refine our
    calculations, so that we can provide an even stronger test of our
    fundamental understanding," said Brookhaven Lab theorist Amarjit Soni.

    Matter/antimatter imbalance "The need for a difference between matter and antimatter is built into the modern theory of the cosmos," said Norman
    Christ of Columbia University. "Our current understanding is that the
    present universe was created with nearly equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Except for the tiny effects being studied here, matter and antimatter should be identical in every way, beyond conventional choices
    such as assigning negative charge to one particle and positive charge to
    its anti-particle. Some difference in how these two types of particles
    operate must have tipped the balance to favor matter over antimatter,"
    he said.



    ==========================================================================
    "Any differences in matter and antimatter that have been observed to
    date are far too weak to explain the predominance of matter found in our current universe," he continued. "Finding a significant discrepancy
    between an experimental observation and predictions based on the
    Standard Model would potentially point the way to new mechanisms of
    particle interactions that lie beyond our current understanding -- and
    which we hope to find to help to explain this imbalance." Modeling quark interactions All of the experiments that show a difference between matter
    and antimatter involve particles made of quarks, the subatomic building
    blocks that bind through the strong force to form protons, neutrons, and
    atomic nuclei -- and also less-familiar particles like kaons and pions.

    "Each kaon and pion is made of a quark and an antiquark, surrounded by
    a cloud of virtual quark-antiquark pairs, and bound together by force
    carriers called gluons," explained Christopher Kelly, of Brookhaven
    National Laboratory.

    The Standard Model-based calculations of how these particles behave
    must therefore include all the possible interactions of the quarks and
    gluons, as described by the modern theory of strong interactions, known
    as quantum chromodynamics (QCD).



    ==========================================================================
    In addition, these bound particles move at close to the speed of
    light. That means the calculations must also include the principles
    of relativity and quantum theory, which govern such near-light-speed
    particle interactions.

    "Because of the huge number of variables involved, these are some of
    the most complicated calculations in all of physics," noted Tianle Wang,
    of Columbia University.

    Computational challenge To conquer the challenge, the theorists used
    a computing approach called lattice QCD, which "places" the particles
    on a four-dimensional space-time lattice (three spatial dimensions
    plus time). This box-like lattice allows them to map out all the
    possible quantum paths for the initial kaon to decay to the final two
    pions. The result becomes more accurate as the number of lattice points increases. Wang noted that the "Feynman integral" for the calculation
    reported here involved integrating 67 million variables! These complex calculations were done by using cutting-edge supercomputers. The first
    part of the work, generating samples or snapshots of the most likely
    quark and gluon fields, was performed on supercomputers located in the
    US, Japan, and the UK. The second and most complex step of extracting
    the actual kaon decay amplitudes was performed at the National Energy
    Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a DOE Office of Science
    user facility at DOE's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    But using the fastest computers is not enough; these calculations are
    still only possible even on these computers when using highly optimized computer codes, developed for the calculation by the authors.

    "The precision of our results cannot be increased significantly by
    simply performing more calculations," Kelly said. "Instead, in order to
    tighten our test of the Standard Model we must now overcome a number of
    more fundamental theoretical challenges. Our collaboration has already
    made significant strides in resolving these issues and coupled with improvements in computational techniques and the power of near-future
    DOE supercomputers, we expect to achieve much improved results within
    the next three to five years."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
    DOE/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory. Note: Content may be edited for
    style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. R. Abbott, T. Blum, P. A. Boyle, M. Bruno,
    N. H. Christ, D.

    Hoying, C. Jung, C. Kelly, C. Lehner, R. D. Mawhinney,
    D. J. Murphy, C. T. Sachrajda, A. Soni, M. Tomii,
    T. Wang.

    Direct CP violation and the DI=1/2 rule in K->pp decay from
    the standard model. Physical Review D, 2020; 102 (5) DOI:
    10.1103/PhysRevD.102.054509 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200917122822.htm

    --- up 3 weeks, 3 days, 6 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)