Tree planting does not always boost ecosystem carbon stocks, study finds


Date:
July 15, 2020
Source:
University of Stirling
Summary:
Planting huge numbers of trees to mitigate climate change is
'not always the best strategy' - with some experimental sites in
Scotland failing to increase carbon stocks, a new study has found.



FULL STORY ========================================================================== Planting huge numbers of trees to mitigate climate change is "not always
the best strategy" -- with some experimental sites in Scotland failing
to increase carbon stocks, a new study has found.


========================================================================== Experts at the University of Stirling and the James Hutton Institute
analysed four locations in Scotland where birch trees were planted
onto heather moorland -- and found that, over decades, there was no net increase in ecosystem carbon storage.

The team -- led by Dr Nina Friggens, of the Faculty of Natural Sciences
at Stirling -- found that any increase to carbon storage in tree biomass
was offset by a loss of carbon stored in the soil.

Dr Friggens said: "Both national and international governments have
committed to plant huge numbers of trees to mitigate climate change, based
on the simple logic that trees -- when they photosynthesise and grow --
remove carbon from the atmosphere and lock it into their biomass. However, trees also interact with carbon in soil, where much more carbon is found
than in plants.

"Our study considered whether planting native trees on heather moorlands,
with large soil carbon stores, would result in net carbon sequestration --
and, significantly, we found that over a period of 39 years, it did not."
The tree-planting experiments -- in the Grampians, Cairngorms and Glen
Affric - - were set up by the late Dr John Miles, of the then Institute
of Terrestrial Ecology (a forerunner to the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology), in 1980, and the Hutton Institute in 2005. The research sites enabled the team to assess the impact of tree planting on vegetation and
soil carbon stocks, by comparing these experimental plots to adjacent
control plots consisting of original heath vegetation.



========================================================================== Working with Dr Ruth Mitchell and Professor Alison Hester, both of
the James Hutton Institute, Dr Friggens measured soil respiration --
the amount of carbon dioxide released from the soil to the atmosphere
-- at regular intervals during 2017 and 2018. Along with soil cores
taken by Dr Friggens and Dr Thomas Parker to record soil carbon stocks
and calculated tree carbon stocks by using non- destructive metrics,
including tree height and girth.

The study recorded a 58 percent reduction in soil organic carbon stocks
12 years after the birch trees had been planted on the heather moorland
-- and, significantly, this decline was not compensated for by the gains
in carbon contained in the growing trees.

It also found that, 39 years after planting, the carbon sequestered into
tree biomass offset the carbon lost from the soil -- but, crucially,
there was no overall increase in ecosystem carbon stocks.

Dr Friggens said: "When considering the carbon stocks both above and
below ground together, planting trees onto heather moorlands did not
lead to an increase in net ecosystem carbon stocks 12 or 39 years after planting. This is because planting trees also accelerated the rate at
which soil organisms work to decompose organic matter in the soil --
in turn, releasing carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere.

"This work provides evidence that planting trees in some areas of Scotland
will not lead to carbon sequestration for at least 40 years -- and, if
we are to successfully manage our landscapes for carbon sequestration,
planting trees is not always the best strategy.



========================================================================== "Tree planting can lead to carbon sequestration; however, our study
highlights the need to understand where, in the landscape, this approach
is best deployed in order to achieve maximum climate mitigation gains."
Dr Ruth Mitchell, a researcher within the James Hutton Institute's
Ecological Sciences department and co-author of the study, said: "Our work shows that tree planting locations need to be carefully sited, taking into account soil conditions, otherwise the tree planting will not result in
the desired increase in carbon storage and climate change mitigation."
Although conducted in Scotland, the study's results are relevant in vast
areas around the northern fringes of the boreal forests and the southern
Arctic tundra, of North America and Eurasia.

Dr Friggens added: "The climate emergency affects us all -- and it is
important that strategies implemented to mitigate climate change --
such as large-scale tree planting -- are robust and achieve the intended outcomes.

"Changes to carbon storage -- both above and below ground -- must be
better quantified and understood before we can be assured that large-scale
tree planting will have the intended policy and climate outcomes."

========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Stirling. Note:
Content may be edited for style and length.


========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Nina L. Friggens, Alison J. Hester, Ruth J. Mitchell, Thomas
C. Parker,
Jens‐Arne Subke, Philip A. Wookey. Tree planting in organic
soils does not result in net carbon sequestration on decadal
timescales. Global Change Biology, 2020; DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15229 ==========================================================================

Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200715123154.htm

--- up 1 hour, 54 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)