Same here, I'm using OpenXP via SSH on one of my servers
because I prefer its ease of use.
I think it is a little easier to handle compared to binkd/
hpt/golded as it is menu-driven rather than config-file-
driven.
So, if someone just wants to be part of the message
networks, OpenXP is a fine solution and easier than binkd/
hpt/golded or a complete BBS package. And it is more
comfortable than QWK/MultiMail IMHO.
OpenXP is available for Linux too with either /32 or /64
versions.
The linux release is 64 bit and the windows release is 32 bit.
The source is also available so for can build their own if they choose.
The linux release is 64 bit and the windows release is 32 bit.
Linux = i586 or x86_64
I believe i586=32bit
And yes.. The Windows version is only 32bit.
And yes.. The Windows version is only 32bit.
I think it's likely windows will go 64bit at some point. Probably sooner than later but I don't know.
I don't think Windows will drop 32-bit support anytime soon and there is not much you would gain with a 64-bit OpenXP version anyway.
Hello acn!
** On Wednesday 26.05.21 - 16:28, acn wrote to N1uro:
Same here, I'm using OpenXP via SSH on one of my servers
because I prefer its ease of use.
Do you have to do anything special for the SSH part? Is it
just a matter of pointing to a specific port number, and that's
it?
The linux release is 64 bit and the windows release is 32 bit.
Linux = i586 or x86_64
I believe i586=32bit
Yep, and yep.
But there is no 32bit linux version. Just an x86_64 binary
or rpm package. I'm not sure why that is. Maybe no one uses
32bit linux anymore? I've been 64bit since 2002 or so.
Same here, I'm using OpenXP via SSH on one of my servers
because I prefer its ease of use.
Do you have to do anything special for the SSH part? Is it
just a matter of pointing to a specific port number, and that's
it?
Sysop: | CyberNix |
---|---|
Location: | London, UK |
Users: | 22 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 04:54:09 |
Calls: | 898 |
Files: | 4,586 |
Messages: | 686,892 |