The Internet Archive's last-ditch effort to save itself

Date:
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:28:36 GMT

Description:
A lost lawsuit, a flimsy appeal, and misleading public statements... things aren't looking good for the Internet's archivist.

FULL STORY ======================================================================

On April 19th, The Internet Archive filed the final brief in their appeal of the " Hachette v. Internet Archive " lawsuit (for which, judgment was handed down, against Internet Archive , last year).

What is curious, is that this final brief fails -- almost completely -- to reasonably address the core issues of the lawsuit. What's more, the public statements that followed, by The Internet Archive, appeared to be crafted to drum up public sympathy by misrepresenting the core of the case itself.

Which suggests that The Internet Archive is very much aware that they are likely to lose this appeal.

After a careful reading of the existing public documents relating to this case... it truly is difficult to come to any other conclusion.

The Internet Archive does some critically important work by archiving, and indexing, a wide variety of culturally significant material (from webpages to decades old magazine articles). In this work, they help to preserve history.
A extremely noble, and valuable, endeavor. Which makes the likelihood of this legal defeat all the more unfortunate. What is "Hachette v. Internet
Archive"?

Here's the short- short version of this lawsuit:

The Internet Archive created a program they called "Controlled Digital Lending" (CDL) -- where a physical book is scanned, turned into a digital file, and that digital file is then "loaned" out to people on the Internet.
In 2020, The Internet Archive removed what few restrictions existed with this Digital Lending program, allowing an unlimited number of people to download the digital copy of a book.

The result was a group of publishers filing the " Hachette v. Internet
Archive " lawsuit. That lawsuit focused on two key complaints:

The books were "digitized" (converted from physical to digital form) -- and distributed -- without the permission of the copyright holders (publishers, authors, etc.).

The Internet Archive received monetary donations (and other monetary rewards) as a result of freely distributing said copyrighted material. Again, without permission of the copyright holders. Effectively making the Internet
Archive's CDL a commercial enterprise for the distribution of what is best described as "pirated material".

That lawsuit was decided, against The Internet Archive, in 2023 -- with the judge declaring that "no case or legal principle supports" their defense of "Fair Use".

That judgment was appealed by The Internet Archive. Which brings us to today, and thier final defense (in theory). What is the final defense of The
Internet Archive?

Let's take a look at the final brief in The Internet Archive's bid to appeal this ruling. Read the full article

The full article is available for free over at Lunduke.Locals.com (the main site for The Lunduke Journal ).



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://lunduke.substack.com/p/the-internet-archives-last-ditch


--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)