6 Dirty Secrets of the Linux and Open Source Industry
Date:
Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:05:11 GMT
Description:
The Linux Foundation, Mozilla, and Open Source Initiative don't want us talking about these topics. Which is weird.
FULL STORY ======================================================================Lundukes
History of Computers is just one of many free books that come with a subscription to The Lunduke Journal . Which, thanks to our Founding Members
, is down to $1/month right now. Get 76% off for 1 year
The broader Linux and Open Source industry has been around for quite a number of years now and brings in an absolutely staggering amount of money.
Like any such industry there are going to be skeletons in the closet. Little facts that, while often hiding in plain sight, are kept as quiet as possible.
Lets go over 6 such dirty little secrets of Linux and Open Source. Not all
of these are, necessarily, bad things but they are all topics that for one reason or another their respective companies and organizations (desperately) dont want us to talk about.
And that, alone, makes them worth remembering. The Linux Foundation is funded (and controlled) by Microsoft and Facebook
As of 2018, the cost of a Platinum Membership to the Linux Foundation cost $500,000 USD (half a million) per year. A system that propelled The Linux Foundation revenue up to $177 Million dollars in 2021 .
Platinum Members include Microsoft, Oracle, and Facebook (now Meta).
The Board of Directors of The Linux Foundation is made up of representatives from Facebook (Meta), Microsoft, and Amazon (who employs the Chair).
Think youre being rebellious and staying clear of Big Tech by using Linux? Think again.
Who controls and funds the foundation which controls Linux?
Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon. Donations to The Linux Foundation do not
fund Linux. Not even a little.
If you check the Linux Foundation donation page , they make a rather odd disclaimer:
100% of donations received go towards funding diversity programs.
Putting any (even tangentially) political thoughts to one side for a moment (because The Lunduke Journal really doesnt like getting political)
Its really weird that The Linux Foundation takes donations but does not use them for the development of Linux .
In fact did you know that The Linux Foundation spends only 3.4% of its
total revenue on Linux? Its true . And its weird. Linux is, quite
literally, the smallest budgetary item that The Linux Foundation feels is worthy of noting.
UPDATE : The Linux Foundation has updated this page and removed that disclaimer! Have they decided to now finally start directing donations towards Linux development (after having the no donations used for Linux
policy for so many years)? We have reached out for comment and details.
Linux foundation is in the Vaccine Passport and NFT business
While were talking about things that are not ( in any way ) related to Linux
Did you know that The Linux Foundation is in the Vaccine Passport business?
Its true ! In fact, they are big time into that (decidedly not related to Linux at all ) business! Multiple pushes, lots of staff, big monetary investment its clearly a big deal for them.
And now it appears that The Linux Foundation is getting involved with NFTs as well .
What do Vaccine Passports or NFTs have to do with Linux? Who knows! Your guess is as good as mine! I suppose if The Linux Foundation wants to focus
on so many not Linux things, thats totally their right! Though perhaps they should consider a name change?
A little bit of irony here: Last year I wrote a (clearly satirical) article entitled Linux Foundation releases Linux as NFT . Flash forward a few
months and The Linux Foundation is now getting involved with NFTs. Anyone care to wager on how long before my satirical article becomes 100% reality? Open Source Initiative banned 100% of its founders
The Open Source Initiative (or the OSI for short) which has the goal of
being the steward of the Open Source Definition was founded in 1998 by two gentlemen: Bruce Perens and Eric S Raymond.
Both of those founders would later be forced out of the organization that they, themselves, created.
In 2005, the Open Source Initiative rejected a membership application from Bruce Perens.
In March of 2020, Eric S Raymond (known often as ESR) was completely banned from the Open Source Initiative (including the public mailing lists).
Thats right. 100% of the founders of the Open Source Initiative are not allowed to be involved with the Open Source Initiative.
Right about now its worth noting that the Open Source Initiative is funded by : Google, Microsoft, Comcast, and Twitter (among others).
Fun side note: Many efforts have been launched to ban the founder of the Free Software Foundation (Richard Stallman), and the creator of the Linux Kernel (Linus Torvalds), from the projects that they started. There are significant portions of the Open Source industry that really have it out for the founders of the projects they use. Mozilla is for-profit corporation with nearly $1 Billion in revenue per year
Many supporters of Mozilla, and the Firefox web browser that it creates, will often declare, Mozilla is a non-profit!
*cough* Not quite.
While its true that The Mozilla Foundation is an actual 501c3 foundation simply stating that would be more than a little misleading.
You see, The Mozilla Foundation is the 100% owner of a for-profit corporation known as Mozilla Corporation. The same person runs both The Foundation and The Corporation.
(Think about that last paragraph for a moment.)
Mozilla Corporation has just shy of 1,000 employees, world wide, and brings
in well over $800 Million dollars per year .
Does being a for-profit, corporation which brings in close to a billion dollars every year make Mozilla bad or evil? No. No, it doesnt. But to
say Mozilla is a foundation or Mozilla is a non-profit is intentional deceptive.
Lets call Mozilla what they are: A massively profitable, incredibly large, for-profit corporation. The term Open Source was coined by the NSA
Who first used the term Open Source when talking about software with the source code available?
According to Red Hat, OpenSource.com , and the Open Source Initiative the answer is "Christine Peterson in 1998.
No offense is intended towards Christine Peterson but this answer is not only wrong but wildly wrong .
The Lunduke Journal has done an in depth study of the topic and determined that:
The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by a company would be
Caldera in 1996.
The first known usage of the phrase (in context) by an individual /
journalist would be May of 1990 by Tony Patti (on USENET).
The first known potential usage of the phrase (in context) by a government agency might be the NSA in 1987.
The truth is, that the NSA made, likely, the first published instance of Open Source (as a phrase) being used to describe software in 1987. A full 11
years prior to the 1998 event that most of the Open Source industry claims.
And, even if you completely discount the usage of the term by the NSA certainly Caldera would qualify. Heck, in 1996, Caldera issued a press release where the title was (literally):
CALDERA. ANNOUNCES OPEN SOURCE CODE MODEL FOR DOS
Couldnt be more on the nose.
Heres the crazy part: Red Hat, the Open Source Initiative, etc they all know this. They know that Caldera (for example) used the term a full two years before they claim it was invented.
One has to ask, Why do the prominent members of the Open Source industry push this known false information about the origin of the phrase?
What possible benefit could there be for them to spread this known lie?
Its all pretty weird. Just worth keeping in mind
Again. Some of these things you may not view as all that bad.
Heck! You might even like some of the items listed above (and thats totally cool)!
Just remember them. Because, for whatever reason, the people involved do not want you to think about them (and they certainly dont want you talking about them).
And whenever a big tech company (or tech organization) doesnt want you thinking about a topic is exactly when just maybe you should. 10 books. Video games. Exclusive articles & podcasts. The number of perks are off the charts for subscribers to The Lunduke Journal. Get 76% off for 1 year
Right now, thanks to the Founding Member subscribers of The Lunduke Journal , the standard subscription price is craaaaaaazy inexpensive. Like a buck a month. For all those perks . Its insane. Take advantage of it.
Or, heck, become a Founding Member subscriber and help drive that price even lower!
======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://lunduke.substack.com/p/6-dirty-secrets-of-the-linux-and
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)