• A fleeting subatomic particle may be exposing flaws in a major ph

    From PopularScience-Physics@1337:1/100 to All on Fri Sep 22 23:45:51 2023
    A fleeting subatomic particle may be exposing flaws in a major physics theory

    Date:
    Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:00:00 +0000

    Description:
    The Department of Energys Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory near Chicago. Ryan Postel/Fermilab A refined measurement for subatomic muons has major implicationsif fundamental theories are accurate. The post A fleeting subatomic particle may be exposing flaws in a major physics theory appeared first on Popular Science .

    FULL STORY ======================================================================
    The Department of Energys Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory near Chicago. Ryan Postel/Fermilab

    One of the biggest questions in particle physics is whether the field itself tells an incomplete picture of the universe. At Fermilab, a US Department of Energy facility in suburban Chicago, particle physicists are trying to
    resolve this identity crisis. There, members of the Muon g 2 (pronounced as
    g minus 2) Collaboration have been carefully measuring a peculiar particle known as a muon. Last week, they released their updated results: the muona heavier, more ephemeral counterpart of the electronmay be under the influence of something unknown.

    If accurate, its a sign that the theories forming the foundation of modern particle physics dont tell the whole story. Or is it? While the
    Collaborations scientists have been studying muons, theoretical researchers have been re-evaluating their numbers, leaving doubt whether such an error exists.

    Either way, theres something thats not understood, and it needs to be resolved, says Ian Bailey , a particle physicist at Lancaster University in the UK and a member of the Muon g 2 collaboration.

    The tried and tested basic law of modern particle physicswhat scientists call the Standard Model enshrines the muon as one of our universes fundamental building blocks. Muons, like electrons, are subatomic particles that carry negative electrical charge; unlike electrons, muons decay after a few millionths of a second. Still, scientists readily encounter muons in the
    wild. Earths upper atmosphere is laced with muon rain, spawned by high-energy cosmic rays striking our planet.

    But if the muon doesnt always look like physicists expect it to look, that is a sign that the Standard Model is incomplete, and some hitherto unknown physics is at play. The muon, it turns out, is predicted to have more sensitivity to the existence of new physics thanthe electron, says Bailey.

    [Related: The green revolution is coming for power-hungry particle accelerators ]

    Also like electrons, muons spin like whirling tops, which creates a magnetic field. The titular g defines how quickly it spins. In isolation, a muons g
    has a value of 2. In reality, muons dont exist in isolation. Even in a
    vacuum, muons are hounded by throngs of short-lived virtual particles that
    pop in and out of quantum existence, influencing a muons spin.

    The Standard Model should account for these particles, too. But in the 2000s, scientists at Brookhaven National Laboratory measured g and found that it was subtly but significantly greater than the Standard Models prediction. Perhaps the Brookhaven scientists had gotten it wrongor, perhaps, the muon was at the mercy of particles or forces the Standard Model doesnt consider.

    Breaking the Standard Model would be one of the biggest moments in particle physics history, and particle physicists dont take such disruption lightly. The Brookhaven scientists moved their experiment to Fermilab in Illinois, where they could take advantage of a more powerful particle accelerator to mass-produce muons. In 2018, the Muon g 2 experiment began.

    Three years later, the experimental collaboration released their first results, suggesting that Brookhaven hadnt made a mistake or seen an illusion. The results released last week add data from two additional runs in 2018 and 2019, corroborating what was published in 2021 and improving its precision. Their observed value for g around 2.0023diverges from what theory would predict after the eighth decimal place.

    [Related: Scientists found a fleeting particle from the universes first moments ]

    Weve got a true value of the magnetic anomaly pinned down nicely, says Lawrence Gibbons , a particle physicist at Cornell University and a member of the Muon g 2 collaboration.

    Had this result come out several years ago, physicists might have heralded it as definitive proof of physics beyond the Standard Model. But today, its not so straightforward. Few affairs of the quantum world are simple, but the spanner in these quantum works is the fact that the Standard Models
    prediction itself is blurry.

    There has been a change coming from the theory side, says Bailey.

    Physicists think that the virtual particles that pull at a muons g do so with different forces. Some particles yank with electromagnetism, whose influence is easy to calculate. Others do so via the strong nuclear force (whose
    effects we mainly notice because it holds particles together inside atomic nuclei). Computing the strong nuclear forces influence is nightmarishly complex, and theoretical particle physicists often substituted data from past experiments in their calculations.

    Recently, however, some groups of theorists have adopted a technique known as lattice quantum chromodynamics, or lattice QCD, which allows them to crunch strong nuclear force numbers on computers. When scientists feed lattice QCD numbers into their g predictions, they produce a result thats more in line with Muon g 2s results.

    Adding to the confusion is that a different particle experiment located in Siberiaknown as CMD-3 produced a result that also makes the Muon g 2 discrepancy disappear. That one is a real head scratcher, says Gibbons.

    The Muon g 2 Collaboration isnt done. Crunching through three times as much data, collected between 2021 and 2023, remains on the collaborations to-do list. Once they analyze all that data, which may be ready in 2025, physicists believe they can make their g minus 2 estimate twice as precise. But its not clear whether this refinement would settle things, as theoretical physicists race to update their predictions. The question of whether or not muons really are misbehaving remains an open one.

    The post A fleeting subatomic particle may be exposing flaws in a major physics theory appeared first on Popular Science . Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.



    ======================================================================
    Link to news story:
    https://www.popsci.com/science/muon-measurement-fermilab/


    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: tqwNet Science News (1337:1/100)