Would a massive shade between Earth and the sun help slow climate change?
Date:
Wed, 09 Aug 2023 10:00:00 +0000
Description:
A solar flare flashes at the edge of the sun, captured by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory in 2012. NASA/GSFC/SDO The concept involves an asteroid counterweight and would be tremendously expensive to pull off. The post Would a massive shade between Earth and the sun help slow climate change? appeared first on Popular Science .
FULL STORY ======================================================================
A solar flare flashes at the edge of the sun, captured by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory in 2012. NASA/GSFC/SDO
Some of the most exotic solutions to climate change are the various forms of geoengineering . Such proposals aim to reduce global warming by shrinking the amount of solar radiation that reaches Earths surfaceby, say, injecting large amounts of sulfur dioxide or dust into the air to mimic the cooling effect of large volcanic eruptions. Or building catapults to launch lunar dust into orbit around Earth and intercept the suns rays in the space near our planet.
But University of Hawaii cosmologist Istvn Szapudi has an even more far-out idea: place a 372,000-mile-wide sun shade tethered to a captured asteroid between Earth and the sun to reduce the amount of solar radiation reaching
our planet by 1.7 percent. His analysis is agnostic to the shades shape, though he imagines it could be a circular shade made of triangular segments, able to open or close like flower petals to allow variable amounts of
sunlight through.
Its not going to cast a sharp shadow, Szapudi says. Maybe with a telescope
you could notice that there is something in front of the sun. But other than that, it would just be that people would notice that the weather is a little bit better.
He readily admits that this concept would require millions of dollars investment in just preliminary engineering studies to see if it is really possible. Of course, its unrealistic to actually do this, so hopefully, we will slowly give up fossil fuels, Szapudi says, citing a much more mainstream goal to curb a source of climate change. But thats a very long-term process.
A concept illustration of a sun shade bound to an asteroid. Istvan Szapudi/Institute for Astronomy
In the meantime, he suggests, maybe the world can consider alternatives to help mitigate the change in climate that occurs from the carbon already in Earths atmosphere today.
Szapudis proposal, as described in a paper published on July 31 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , would place this massive
sun shade at the Sun-Earth Lagrange Point 1, or L1. This is a region of space about 932,000 miles toward the sun from Earth where the gravity of both
bodies cancels out, allowing a spacecraft orbiting L1 to maintain a constant position relative to the sun and Earth with minimal maneuvering. The James Webb Space Telescope makes use of the same phenomena at L2 , the L1 points counterpart 932,000 miles away from Earth in the direction of the outer solar system.
[Related: How big banks can make real progress against climate change ]
Szapudi is not the first to suggest placing a sun shade at L1, but previous proposals ran into problems. Namely, a large sun shade will also act like a solar sail, catching solar radiation that will push the structure out of position at L1. Previous proposals got around this by making the sun shade extremely massive, on the order of 350 million tons, perhaps of metal or asteroid stuff an utterly unrealistic amount of mass even for a proposal
thats already this far out.
Szapudi instead proposes connecting it to an asteroid counterweight by
tethers up to 1.9 million miles long. Since the suns gravity is more potent the further away from L1 and closer to the star you go, the tug of solar gravity on the asteroid will counterbalance the radiation pressure on the sun shade, allowing it to stay in place.
With such a configuration, Szapudi estimated the shade itself might weigh
only 35,000 tons. Thats something that SpaceX could put up in space using its current rockets, he says, though itd take a lot of time and effort. A sun shade could be made even lighter, Szapudi suggests, if made from something like graphene, an extremely light and strong material consisting of
atom-thick sheets of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice pattern.
Astronomers would have to identify a suitable near-Earth asteroid for the counterweight through something like the University of Hawaiis Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System ( Pan-STARRS ), Szapudi says. But once they did, the sun shade could be tethered to the asteroid in its
existing orbit and used as a solar sail to divert the space rock toward the
L1 point.
Engineering-wise, the whole idea is extremely speculative, Szapudi
emphasizes, relying on technology that is not yet developed, such as
materials strong and light enough to serve as the tethers.
[Related on PopSci+: Cloudy with a chance of cooling the planet ]
But its also not clear if geoengineering of this sort would actually help mitigate the effects of climate change, or do so without introducing other, unpredictable and negative consequences, according to Rutgers University climatologist Alan Robock . Robock leads the Rutgers Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, which uses climate change models to predict the effects of geoengineering interventions.
What if you start doing it and you say, OK, we figured out that 90 percent of the world is going to be better off, but 10 percent is going to be worse off, Robock says. But we dont know which 10 percent because of randomness in the climate system.
And some effects are well understood, likely, and not good, he adds.
For example, youd get drought in Africa and Asia, because the summer monsoon is driven by the temperature difference between the land and the ocean in the summer, Robock says. If you block out the sun, the land would cool more than the ocean. And so that temperature difference would go down. In the summer monsoon precipitation would be reduced.
And if something went wrong with the sun shield, and it stopped blocking the sun suddenly, Earth would warm back up much more rapidly than humans have
ever experienced r.
Thats called the termination problem, Robock says, and its something that
dogs all geoengineering proposals.
And then theres also the very human problem of cooperating on what is essentially a species-wide project: building and tuning a sun shade. How do humans agree on how much sun to block, or as Robock puts it, how does the world agree on where to set the planetary thermostat? Countries like Canada and Russia wouldnt mind it being a little bit warmer, he says. In fact, weve calculated their agriculture would improve, but countries in the tropics
would want it cooler because sea levels are going up, theyre already
drowning.
Ultimately Robock sees geoengineering projects as potential distractions from reducing emissions today. The best solution to climate change, Robock saysand Szapudi agreesis to leave fossil fuels in the ground.
But Szapudi sees his proposal as a project to help mitigate the lasting effects of emissions that have already taken place. It could be an insurance policy to help turn off the worst effects of global warming that are already baked into the climatebut it only works if we start such a long term research project now.
As an insurance policy, though, itd have one expensive premium. If technology develops the way I hope it would, maybe this is a trillion-dollar project, Szapudi says. You would need at least an army of engineers, probably tens of millions of dollars just to explore the concept to enough detail.
The post Would a massive shade between Earth and the sun help slow climate change? appeared first on Popular Science . Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.
======================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.popsci.com/science/sun-shade-asteroid-lagrange/
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Science News (1337:1/100)