• Digital contact tracing alone may not be

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Wed Aug 19 21:30:32 2020
    Digital contact tracing alone may not be miracle answer for COVID-19


    Date:
    August 19, 2020
    Source:
    University of Otago
    Summary:
    In infectious disease outbreaks, digital contact tracing alone
    could reduce the number of cases, but not as much as manual contract
    tracing, new research reveals.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    In infectious disease outbreaks, digital contact tracing alone could
    reduce the number of cases, but not as much as manual contract tracing,
    new University of Otago-led research published in the Cochrane Library
    reveals.


    ========================================================================== Senior Research Fellow in the Department of Preventive and Social
    Medicine, Dr Andrew Anglemyer, led this systematic review of the
    effectiveness of digital technologies for identifying contacts of an
    identified positive case of an infectious disease, in order to isolate
    them and reduce further transmission of the disease.

    The team of researchers summarised the findings of six observational
    studies from outbreaks of different infectious diseases in Sierra Leone, Botswana and the USA and six studies that simulated the spread of diseases
    in an epidemic with mathematical models.

    The results of the review suggest the need for caution by health
    authorities relying heavily on digital contact tracing systems.

    "Digital technologies, combined with other public health interventions,
    may help to prevent the spread of infectious diseases but the technology
    is largely unproven in real-world, outbreak settings," Dr Anglemyer says.

    "Modelling studies provide low certainty of evidence of a reduction in
    cases, and this only occurred when digital contact tracing solutions were
    used together with other public health measures such as self-isolation,"
    he says.



    ========================================================================== "However, limited evidence shows that the technology itself may produce
    more reliable counts of contacts." Overall, the team of researchers
    from New Zealand, the USA, the UK and Australia conclude there is a
    place for digital technologies in contact tracing.

    "The findings of our review suggest that to prevent the spread of
    infectious diseases, governments should consider digital technologies as
    a way to improve current contact tracing methods, not to replace them,"
    the researchers state.

    "In the real world, they won't be pitted against each other, the
    technology would hopefully just augment the current contact tracing
    methods in a given country." They recommend governments consider issues
    of privacy and equity when choosing digital contact tracing systems.



    ==========================================================================
    "If governments implement digital contact tracing technologies, they
    should ensure that at-risk populations are not disadvantaged and they
    need to take privacy concerns into account.

    "The COVID-19 pandemic is disproportionately affecting ethnic minorities,
    the elderly and people living in high deprivation. These health inequities could be magnified with the introduction of digital solutions that do not consider these at-risk populations, who are likely to have poor access
    to smartphones with full connectivity." Contact tracing teams in the
    studies reviewed reported that digital data entry and management systems
    were faster to use than paper systems for recording of new contacts and monitoring of known contacts and possibly less prone to data loss.

    But the researchers conclude there is "very low certainty evidence"
    that contact tracing apps could make a substantial impact on the spread
    of COVID-19, while issues of low adoption, technological variation and
    health equity persist.

    Accessibility or privacy and safety concerns were identified in some of
    the studies. Problems with system access included patchy network coverage,
    lack of data, technical problems with hardware or software that were
    unable to be resolved by local technical teams and higher staff training
    needs including the need for refresher training. Staff also noted concerns around accessibility and logistical issues in administering the systems, particularly in marginalised or under-developed areas of the world.

    The research, published today by the Cochrane Library a collection of
    high- quality, independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making,
    has been carried out as the COVID-19 pandemic shows no signs of waning
    and the World Health Organization and more than 30 countries are exploring
    how digital technology solutions could help stop the spread of the virus.

    Senior Research Fellow Tim Chambers from the University of Otago,
    Wellington, and Associate Professor Matthew Parry from the Department
    of Statistics, were also co-authors of the paper.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Otago. Note: Content
    may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Andrew Anglemyer, Theresa HM Moore, Lisa Parker, Timothy Chambers,
    Alice
    Grady, Kellia Chiu, Matthew Parry, Magdalena Wilczynska, Ella
    Flemyng, Lisa Bero. Digital contact tracing technologies in
    epidemics: a rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
    2020; DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD013699 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200819094754.htm

    --- up 5 weeks, 1 hour, 55 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)