• 'Insect apocalypse' may not be happening

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Aug 11 21:30:38 2020
    'Insect apocalypse' may not be happening in US
    Long-term ecological site study shows no net insect changes

    Date:
    August 11, 2020
    Source:
    University of Georgia
    Summary:
    Scientists have been warning about an 'insect apocalypse' in recent
    years, noting sharp declines in specific areas -- particularly
    in Europe.

    A new study shows these warnings may have been exaggerated and are
    not representative of what's happening to insects on a larger scale.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Scientists have been warning about an "insect apocalypse" in recent years, noting sharp declines in specific areas -- particularly in Europe. A
    new study shows these warnings may have been exaggerated and are not representative of what's happening to insects on a larger scale.


    ========================================================================== University of Georgia professor of agroecology Bill Snyder sought to
    find out if the so-called "insect apocalypse" is really going to happen,
    and if so, had it already begun. Some scientists say it might be only
    30 years before all insects are extinct, so this is a really important
    and timely question for agriculture and conservation.

    Snyder and a team of researchers from UGA, Hendrix College and the U.S.

    Department of Agriculture used more than 5,300 data points for insects
    and other arthropods -- collected over four to 36 years at monitoring
    sites representing 68 natural and managed areas -- to search for evidence
    of declines across the United States.

    Some groups and sites showed increases or decreases in abundance and
    diversity, but many remained unchanged, yielding net abundance and
    biodiversity trends generally indistinguishable from zero. This lack
    of overall increase or decline was consistent across arthropod feeding
    groups, and was similar for heavily disturbed versus relatively natural
    sites. These results were recently published in Nature Ecology and
    Evolution.

    Local observations The idea for the study started last year with a cross-country road trip for Snyder from Washington state to his new home
    in Georgia.



    ==========================================================================
    "I had the same observation a lot of people had. We had our drive across
    the country -- you don't see as many insects squished on your car or windshield." When he got to his home in Bishop, Georgia, it seemed like
    a different story.

    "I noticed the lights outside were full of insects, as many as I remember
    as a kid," he said. "People have this notion -- there seems like [there
    are] fewer insects -- but what is the evidence?" There is some alarming evidence that European honey bees have problems, but Snyder was curious
    if insects everywhere are in decline. "We depend on insects for so many things," he said. "If insects disappear it would be really, really
    bad. Maybe the end of human existence." He was discussing the topic
    with another biologist and friend, Matthew Moran at Hendrix College,
    and they recalled the U.S. National Science Foundation's network of
    Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites, which were established in
    1980 and encompass a network of 25 monitoring locations across each of
    the country's major ecoregions.



    ========================================================================== Ecological sampling The NSF's LTER data is publicly available, but has not previously been gathered into a single dataset to be examined for evidence
    of broad-scale density and biodiversity change through time until now.

    Arthropod data sampled by the team included grasshoppers in the Konza
    Prairie in Kansas; ground arthropods in the Sevilleta desert/grassland in
    New Mexico; mosquito larvae in Baltimore, Maryland; macroinvertebrates
    and crayfish in North Temperate Lakes in Wisconsin; aphids in the
    Midwestern U.S.; crab burrows in Georgia coastal ecosystems; ticks in
    Harvard Forest in Massachusetts; caterpillars in Hubbard Brook in New Hampshire; arthropods in Phoenix, Arizona; and stream insects in the
    Arctic in Alaska.

    The team compared the samples with human footprint index data, which
    includes multiple factors like insecticides, light pollution and built environments to see if there were any overall trends.

    "No matter what factor we looked at, nothing could explain the trends in
    a satisfactory way," said Michael Crossley, a postdoctoral researcher in
    the UGA department of entomology and lead author of the study. "We just
    took all the data and, when you look, there are as many things going
    up as going down. Even when we broke it out in functional groups there
    wasn't really a clear story like predators are decreasing or herbivores
    are increasing." "This is an implication for conservation and one for scientists, who have been calling for more data due to under-sampling
    in certain areas or certain insects. We took this opportunity to use
    this wealth of data that hasn't been used yet," explained Crossley,
    an agricultural entomologist who uses molecular and geospatial tools
    to understand pest ecology and evolution and to improve management
    outcomes. "There's got to be even more data sets that we don't even know
    about. We want to continue to canvass to get a better idea about what's
    going on." Good and bad news To answer Snyder's broad question of,
    "Are there overall declines?" No, according to the study. "But we're
    not going to ignore small changes," Snyder said. "It's worthwhile to differentiate between the two issues." Particular insect species that
    we rely on for the key ecosystem services of pollination, natural pest
    control and decomposition remain unambiguously in decline in North
    America, the authors note.

    In Europe, where studies have found dramatic insect declines, there may
    be a bigger, longer-term impact on insects than the U.S., which has a
    lower population density, according to Snyder.

    "It's not the worst thing in the world to take a deep breath," suggested Snyder. "There's been a lot of environmental policies and changes. A
    lot of the insecticides used in agriculture now are narrow-acting. Some
    of those effects look like they may be working." When it comes to conservation, there's always room for everyone to pitch in and do
    their part.

    "It's hard to tell when you're a single homeowner if you're having an
    effect when you plant more flowers in your garden," he said. "Maybe some
    of these things we're doing are starting to have a beneficial impact. This could be a bit of a hopeful message that things that people are doing
    to protect bees, butterflies and other insects are actually working."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Georgia. Original
    written by Joshua Paine.

    Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Michael S. Crossley, Amanda R. Meier, Emily M. Baldwin, Lauren
    L. Berry,
    Leah C. Crenshaw, Glen L. Hartman, Doris Lagos-Kutz, David
    H. Nichols, Krishna Patel, Sofia Varriano, William E. Snyder,
    Matthew D. Moran. No net insect abundance and diversity declines
    across US Long Term Ecological Research sites. Nature Ecology &
    Evolution, 2020; DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1269-4 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200811125040.htm

    --- up 3 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 55 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)