• Agriculture replaces fossil fuels as lar

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Mon Aug 10 21:30:34 2020
    Agriculture replaces fossil fuels as largest human source of sulfur in
    the environment

    Date:
    August 10, 2020
    Source:
    University of Colorado at Boulder
    Summary:
    New research identifies fertilizer and pesticide applications to
    croplands as the largest source of sulfur in the environment --
    up to 10 times higher than the peak sulfur load seen in the second
    half of the 20th century, during the days of acid rain.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    A new paper out today in Nature Geoscience identifies fertilizer and
    pesticide applications to croplands as the largest source of sulfur in
    the environment - - up to 10 times higher than the peak sulfur load seen
    in the second half of the 20th century, during the days of acid rain.


    ==========================================================================
    As a result, University of Colorado Boulder researchers recommend greatly expanded monitoring of sulfur and examining possible negative impacts
    of this increase, including increasing levels of mercury in wetlands,
    soil degradation and a higher risk for asthma for populations in
    agricultural areas.

    "Sulfur in agriculture is used in many different forms, and we haven't
    studied broadly how those different forms react in the soil," said
    Eve-Lyn Hinckley, lead author of the study, assistant professor of environmental studies and fellow at the Institute of Arctic and Alpine
    Research (INSTAAR) at the University of Colorado Boulder. "No one has
    looked comprehensively at the environmental and human health consequences
    of these [agricultural] additions." Sulfur is a naturally occurring
    element and an important plant nutrient, helping with the uptake of
    nitrogen. It's mined from underground through fossil fuel extraction
    and for the creation of fertilizers and pesticides. But sulfur is also
    highly reactive, meaning it will quickly undergo chemical transformations
    once its stable form surfaces -- affecting the health of ecosystems and reacting to form heavy metals that pose a danger to wildlife and people.

    Historically, coal-fired power plants were the largest source of
    reactive sulfur to the biosphere -- leading to acid rain in the 1960s
    and 1970s, and the degradation of forest and aquatic ecosystems across
    the northeastern U.S. and Europe. Research on this issue prompted the
    Clean Air Act and its amendments, which regulated air pollution and drove sulfur levels from atmospheric sources down to pre-industrial levels.

    "This is a very different problem than the acid rain days," said Hinckley.

    "We've gone from widespread atmospheric deposition over remote forests to targeted additions of reactive sulfur to regional croplands. These amounts
    are much higher than what we saw at the peak of acid rain." Unknown risks


    ==========================================================================
    A majority of the research that examines excess nutrient use in
    agriculture has been in respect to nitrogen and phosphorus. Scientists
    have known for a long time that these two chemicals can cause detrimental effects on the environment, including increased greenhouse gas emissions
    and algae blooms in downstream waters.

    Sulfur has long been applied to agricultural lands to improve the
    production and health of crops, serving as both a fertilizer and
    pesticide.

    "We're moving it through our environment and ecosystems at a much faster
    rate than it would otherwise," said Hinckley.

    Some agricultural industries around the world have even been putting
    more sulfur directly on their fields. So far, only isolated studies
    have given scientists a glimpse into the effects of excess sulfur on
    soil health and surrounding waters.

    In the Florida Everglades, long-term research by the U.S. Geological
    Survey linked large applications of sulfur to sugarcane to the
    production of methyl mercury in the Everglades -- a potent neurotoxin
    that accumulates as it moves up the food chain, affecting each predator
    more than the prey it consumes. This threatens a variety of local wildlife
    that eat fish, as well as humans.



    ==========================================================================
    So the researchers examined trends in sulfur applications across multiple important crops in the U.S.: corn in the Midwest; sugarcane in Florida;
    and wine grapes in California. Their models of sulfur in surface waters
    showed that in areas that are recovering from the impacts of acid rain,
    the amount of sulfur is again increasing.

    The researchers predict that increasing levels of sulfur will continue
    in many croplands around the world, including places like China and
    India that are still working to regulate fossil fuel emissions.

    Hinckley emphasized that simply documenting the impacts of increased
    sulfur on the environment and human health isn't enough -- increased
    monitoring and research should include farmers, regulatory agencies
    and land managers to increase collaboration and collective action on
    the issue.

    "We have an imperative to understand the impact that we're having on
    the environment," said Hinckley. "And then we need to work together
    towards solutions to mitigate those effects." Co-authors of this paper
    include John Crawford, postdoctoral scholar at INSTAAR and researcher in
    the Sustainability Innovation Lab at Colorado (SILC) at the University
    of Colorado Boulder; and Charles T. Driscoll and Habibollah Fakhraei
    of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Syracuse University. Fakhraei has since taken a position at Southern Illinois University.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
    University_of_Colorado_at_Boulder. Original written by Kelsey
    Simpkins. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley, John T. Crawford, Habibollah Fakhraei,
    Charles T.

    Driscoll. A shift in sulfur-cycle manipulation from atmospheric
    emissions to agricultural additions. Nature Geoscience, 2020; DOI:
    10.1038/s41561- 020-0620-3 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200810113214.htm

    --- up 3 weeks, 5 days, 1 hour, 55 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)