• 'Worst-case' CO2 emissions scenario is b

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Aug 4 21:30:26 2020
    'Worst-case' CO2 emissions scenario is best for assessing climate risk
    and impacts to 2050
    RCP 8.5 tracks within 1% of actual emissions

    Date:
    August 4, 2020
    Source:
    Woods Hole Research Center
    Summary:
    The RCP 8.5 carbon emissions pathway is the most appropriate
    for conducting assessments of climate change impacts by 2050,
    according to a new article. Long dismissed as an alarmist
    or misleading worst-case scenario, the authors argue that is
    actually the closest approximation of both historical emissions
    and anticipated outcomes of current global climate policies,
    tracking within 1% of actual emissions.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    The RCP 8.5 C02 emissions pathway, long considered a "worst case scenario"
    by the international science community, is the most appropriate for
    conducting assessments of climate change impacts by 2050, according to
    a new article published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy
    of Sciences. The work was authored by Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC)
    Risk Program Director Dr. Christopher Schwalm, Dr. Spencer Glendon,
    a Senior Fellow at WHRC and founder of Probable Futures, and by WHRC
    President Dr. Philip Duffy. Long dismissed as alarmist or misleading,
    the paper argues that is actually the closest approximation of both
    historical emissions and anticipated outcomes of current global climate policies, tracking within 1% of actual emissions.


    ==========================================================================
    "Not only are the emissions consistent with RCP 8.5 in close agreement
    with historical total cumulative CO2 emissions (within 1%), but
    RCP8.5 is also the best match out to mid-century under current and
    stated policies with still highly plausible levels of CO2 emissions
    in 2100," the authors wrote. ." ..Not using RCP8.5 to describe the
    previous 15 years assumes a level of mitigation that did not occur,
    thereby skewing subsequent assessments by lessening the severity of
    warming and associated physical climate risk." Four scenarios known as Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) were developed in 2005 for
    the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Assessment
    Report (AR5). The RCP scenarios are used in global climate models, and
    include historical greenhouse gas emissions until 2005, and projected
    emissions subsequently. RCP 8.5 assumes the greatest fossil fuel use,
    and a resulting additional 8.5 watts per square meter of radiative
    forcing by 2100.

    The commentary also emphasizes that while there are signs of progress
    on bending the global emissions curve and that our emissions picture may
    change significantly by 2100, focusing on the unknowable, distant future
    may distort the current debate on these issues. "For purposes of informing societal decisions, shorter time horizons are highly relevant, and it is important to have scenarios which are useful on those horizons. Looking
    at mid-century and sooner, RCP8.5 is clearly the most useful choice,"
    they wrote.

    The article also notes that RCP 8.5 would not be significantly impacted
    by the COVID-19 pandemic, adding that "we note that the usefulness of
    RCP 8.5 is not changed due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming
    pandemic restrictions remain in place until the end of 2020 would
    entail a reduction in emissions of -4.7 Gt CO2. This represents less
    than 1% of total cumulative CO2 emissions since 2005 for all RCPs and observations." "Given the agreement of 2005-2020 historical and RCP8.5
    total CO2 emissions and the congruence between current policies and
    RCP8.5 emission levels to mid- century, RCP8.5 has continued utility,
    both as an instrument to explore mean outcomes as well as risk," they concluded. "Indeed, if RCP8.5 did not exist, we'd have to create it."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Woods_Hole_Research_Center. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Christopher R. Schwalm, Spencer Glendon, Philip B. Duffy. RCP8.5
    tracks
    cumulative CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of
    Sciences, 2020; 202007117 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007117117 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200804085912.htm

    --- up 2 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 55 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)