• Desire to be in a group leads to harsher

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Aug 18 21:30:34 2020
    Desire to be in a group leads to harsher judgment of others
    It's not the politics, it's the 'groupiness' that drives discrimination


    Date:
    August 18, 2020
    Source:
    Duke University
    Summary:
    In a time where political affiliations can feel like they're
    leading to tribal warfare, a research team has found that the
    desire to be part of a group is what makes some of us more
    likely to discriminate against people outside our groups, even
    in non-political settings. Some people are just more 'groupy'
    than others.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    If you're reluctant to identify as a Democrat or Republican even though
    you are staunchly liberal or conservative, you're probably also less
    prone to bias in other ways.


    ==========================================================================
    In a time where political affiliations can feel like they're leading to
    tribal warfare, a research team from Duke University's Trinity College
    of Arts & Sciences has found that the desire to be part of a group is
    what makes some of us more likely to discriminate against people outside
    our groups, even in non- political settings.

    "It's not the political group that matters, it's whether an individual
    just generally seems to like being in a group," said Rachel Kranton. She
    is an economist who conducted the research with Scott Huettel, a
    psychologist and neuroscientist.

    "Some people are 'groupy' -- they join a political party, for example,"
    Kranton said. "And if you put those people in any arbitrary setting,
    they'll act in a more biased way than somebody who has the same political opinions, but doesn't join a political party." The research appears this
    week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Kranton and Huettel worked with Seth Sanders, formerly of Duke and now at Cornell, and Matthew Pease, a 2010 Duke graduate now at the University of Pittsburgh
    Medical Center.

    The team tested what they call "groupiness" with 141 participants,
    using in- person research.



    ========================================================================== Participants were asked to allocate money to themselves and someone in
    their group, or to themselves and someone outside their group. They did
    this in different settings.

    For one test, the participants were divided into groups according to
    their self-declared political leanings. In another setting, the groups
    were organized more neutrally, based on their preferences among similar
    poems and paintings.

    In a third test, the other recipients of the money were chosen at random.

    The researchers expected to find the stronger people's opinions were
    within their group, the more they would discriminate against people
    outside the group.

    But that wasn't the case.

    What they found instead was that being more attached to the group itself
    made participants more biased against people outside their groups,
    regardless of the context, compared to people with similar political
    beliefs but who didn't identify as Democrat or Republican.



    ========================================================================== "There is this very specific distinction between the self-declared
    partisans and politically similar independents," Huettel said. "They don't differ in their political positions, but they do behave differently toward people who are outside their groups." A third of the participants were
    not swayed at all by group membership when allocating their money. Those participants were more likely to be politically independent, the
    researchers found.

    "People who say they're politically independent are much less likely to
    show bias in a non-political setting," Kranton said.

    They also found less group-minded people made decisions faster.

    "We don't know if non-groupy people are faster generally," Kranton
    said. "It could be they're making decisions faster because they're not
    paying attention to whether somebody is in their group or not each time
    they have to make a decision." What makes people groupy? The researchers
    don't know, but they did rule out some possibilities. It doesn't relate
    to gender or ethnicity, for example.

    "There's some feature of a person that causes them to be sensitive to
    these group divisions and use them in their behavior across at least two
    very different contexts," Huettel said. "We didn't test every possible
    way in which people differentiate themselves; we can't show you that
    all group-minded identities behave this way. But this is a compelling
    first step." This research was supported by the National Institute on
    Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Mental Health, both a part of
    the National Institutes of Health. (DA023026, R01-108627)

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Duke_University. Original written
    by Gregory Phillips.

    Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Rachel Kranton, Matthew Pease, Seth Sanders, Scott Huettel.

    Deconstructing Bias in Social Preferences Reveals Groupy and
    Not-Groupy Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of
    Sciences, 2020 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918952117 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200818094041.htm

    --- up 4 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 55 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)