• Animal-based research: New experimental

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Wed Oct 21 21:30:30 2020
    Animal-based research: New experimental design for an improved
    reproducibility

    Date:
    October 21, 2020
    Source:
    University of Mu"nster
    Summary:
    In research, the results of studies must be precise and
    reproducible.

    Behavioral scientists have been able to demonstrate that a new
    experimental design can improve the reproducibility and validity
    of results from studies involving animal experiments.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    In research, the results of studies must be precise and reproducible. For
    this reason, researchers carried out experiments under strictly
    standardized laboratory conditions. However, despite the high standards applied, results from individual studies cannot always be reproduced
    in practice. Especially in cases in which animals are used for research purposes and the original study cannot be repeated, this raises severe
    ethical questions. For a long time now, researchers have been debating
    this aspect under the heading "reproducibility crisis." Behavioural
    scientists at the University of Mu"nster have now been able to demonstrate
    that a new experimental design can improve the reproducibility and
    validity of results from studies involving animal experiments. The study
    has been published in the journal Scientific Reports.


    ========================================================================== Methodology What animal scientists usually understand by "standardized experimental conditions" is that for example all the animals are
    tested on the same day in spring, at the same time and by the same
    person. Just taking a different season or time, however, can lead to
    different findings. Nowadays, there are debates more and more often as
    to whether the very strict standardization might not actually be the
    cause of numerous non-reproducible results. This is where the empirical
    study carried out by the Mu"nster researchers comes in.

    Instead of testing all the animals used in an experiment under strictly standardized conditions and at one point in time, the researchers split up
    the one big experiment into smaller, individual ones -- so-called 'mini- experiments'. As a result, there were slight differences between 'mini- experiments' in laboratory-specific ambient conditions such as noise level
    or temperature. "It's important that the biological variation found in
    real life is reflected in the lab," explains Vanessa von Kortzfleisch,
    a PhD student with Prof. Helene Richter at the Institute of Neuro-
    and Behavioural Biology at Mu"nster University and first author of
    the study. "We were able to demonstrate," she adds, "that changing
    the design of the experiment slightly has enormous consequences for
    the knowledge gained." The new experimental design was tried out on
    mice from different breeding lines, with several weeks between each 'mini-experiment'. In order to evaluate the reproducibility of the
    results in both experimental designs, the researchers repeated the same behavioural experiment four times in each design.

    "The results from the mini-experiment design turned out to be better reproducible than the results from the conventionally used standardized design," says Vanessa von Kortzfleisch.

    Improving study designs is one important step towards better reproducible experiments in animal-based research. Although many animal experiments are still indispensable, there is agreement on limiting them to the minimum necessary, with guidance being provided by the "3R concept": replacement, reduction and refinement. The newly developed experimental design is
    not only easy to implement in research work, it also makes a significant contribution to the refinement and reduction of such experiments.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Mu"nster. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Vanessa Tabea von Kortzfleisch, Natasha A. Karp, Rupert Palme,
    Sylvia
    Kaiser, Norbert Sachser, S. Helene Richter. Improving
    reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population
    into several `mini- experiments'. Scientific Reports, 2020; 10
    (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020- 73503-4 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201021111611.htm

    --- up 8 weeks, 2 days, 6 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)