• Cheaters don't always win: Species that

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Mon Oct 19 21:30:30 2020
    Cheaters don't always win: Species that work together do better
    Extinction may be prevented by diverse communities of mutually beneficial species

    Date:
    October 19, 2020
    Source:
    Syracuse University
    Summary:
    The sign of a healthy personal relationship is one that is equally
    mutual - where you get out just as much as you put in. Nature has
    its own version of a healthy relationship. A team of researchers
    investigated these interactions, known as mutualisms, and why they
    are so critical for healthy environments.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    The sign of a healthy personal relationship is one that is equally
    mutual - - where you get out just as much as you put in. Nature has
    its own version of a healthy relationship. Known as mutualisms, they
    are interactions between species that are mutually beneficial for each
    species. One example is the interaction between plants and pollinators,
    where your apple trees are pollinated and the honeybee gets nectar as
    a food reward. But what makes these mutualisms persist in nature? If
    rewards like nectar are offered freely, does this make mutualisms more susceptible to other organisms that take those rewards without providing
    a service in return?

    ==========================================================================
    A team of researchers from the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University, including co-principal investigators Kari Segraves, professor
    of biology, and David Althoff, associate professor of biology, along
    with postdoctoral researcher Mayra Vidal, former research assistant
    professor David Rivers, and Sheng Wang '20 Ph.D., recently researched
    that question and the results have been published in this month's edition
    of the prestigious journal Science.

    They investigated the abilities of simple versus diverse communities
    of mutualists, comparing how each deal with cheaters. Cheaters are
    species that steal the benefits of the mutualism without providing
    anything in return. An example of one of nature's cheaters are nectar
    robbers. Nectar-robbing bees chew through the side of flowers to feed
    on nectar without coming into contact with the flower parts that would
    result in pollination.

    The research team wanted to test if having multiple mutualists with
    similar roles allows the community as a whole to persist when cheaters
    take away the mutualists' resources. The idea was to examine whether
    having more species involved in a mutualism, such as many pollinator
    species interacting with many different plant species, made the mutualism
    less susceptible to the negative effects of cheaters. They also wanted to analyze whether increasing the number of mutualist species allowed all the mutualists to persist or if competition would whittle down the number of mutualists species over time. In essence, the team wanted to understand
    the forces governing large networks of mutualists that occur in nature.

    A&S researchers tested their ideas by producing mutualisms in the lab
    using yeast strains that function as mutualistic species. These strains
    were genetically engineered to trade essential food resources. Each
    strain produced a food resource to exchange with a mutualist partner. They engineered four species of each type of mutualist as well as two cheater strains that were unable to make food resources.

    The researchers assembled communities of yeast that differed both in
    the number of species and the presence of cheaters. They found that
    communities with higher numbers of mutualist species were better able to withstand the negative effects of cheaters because there were multiple
    species of mutualists performing the same task. If one species was lost
    from the community due to competing with a cheater, there were other
    species around to perform the task, showing that the presence of more
    species in a community can lessen the negative effects of cheaters.

    "It's similar to thinking about a plant that has many pollinator
    species," says Segraves. "If one pollinator species is lost, there
    are other pollinator species around to pollinate. If a plant only has
    one species of pollinator that goes extinct, the mutualism breaks down
    and might cause extinction of the plant." Their results highlight the importance of having multiple mutualist species that provide similar
    resources or services, essentially creating a backup in case one species
    goes extinct. Segraves compares this phenomenon to the relationship
    between retailers and consumers. Communities typically have multiple
    banks, grocery stores, restaurants and hospitals to ensure that there
    are always goods and services available should something happen to one
    company or facility, or, as with COVID today, grocery stores now have
    multiple suppliers to fend off shortages.

    Segraves says future research will explore the possibility of a mutualist species becoming a cheater. The group is testing if mutualists that
    perform the same function might set up an environment that allows
    one of those mutualist species to become a cheater since there are
    other mutualists around that can fill that role. They predict that the mutualist species that is experiencing the most competition from the
    other mutualists will be the species that switches to cheating. They
    also hope to determine how the mutualists and cheaters evolved over
    time to provide a deeper understanding of the actual changes that led
    to differing outcomes in the communities.

    The team's research was funded by a $710,000, three-year grant from the National Science Foundation.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Syracuse_University. Original written
    by Dan Bernardi.

    Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Mayra C. Vidal, Sheng Pei Wang, David M. Rivers, David M. Althoff,
    Kari
    A. Segraves. Species richness and redundancy promote
    persistence of exploited mutualisms in yeast. Science, 2020 DOI:
    10.1126/science.abb6703 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201019145551.htm

    --- up 8 weeks, 6 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)