• Crop residue decisions affect soil life

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Wed Jun 17 21:30:38 2020
    Crop residue decisions affect soil life

    Date:
    June 17, 2020
    Source:
    American Society of Agronomy
    Summary:
    New findings share how prescribed fire and no-till management
    impact soil microbes.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    In some ways, farming is like cooking. Cooking would be much easier if
    we could leave the kitchen after eating and not come back until we make
    the next meal.

    But someone needs to put away the leftovers, do the dishes, and clean
    up the table.


    ========================================================================== Similarly, there's work to do in farm fields after harvest and before
    planting the next spring.

    After harvest in the fall, farmers take the harvested crops to market
    or store them on their farm. They don't take the whole plant from the
    field, though.

    The leftover parts of the plant, like the stalk and leaves from corn,
    remain in the field. This debris is called crop residue.

    Using no-till and prescribed fire management are two potential ways to
    manage crop residue. Both practices help keep organic matter and nitrogen
    in the soil.

    However, research was needed to understand how these two practices can
    affect long-term soil health.

    Lisa Fultz and her team want to help farmers determine the best way
    to manage their residue between growing seasons. To do this, her team
    decided to learn more about how no-till and prescribed fire management
    affect nutrients and microbes in the soil. Fultz is a researcher at
    Louisiana State University AgCenter.



    ========================================================================== No-till is a practice where farmers plant directly into the crop debris
    from the previous year. Prescribed fires are used to purposely burn off
    the previous crop debris with controlled fire. "Both of these practices
    have minimal physical disturbance to the soil," says Fultz.

    Both of these practices also come with drawbacks. No-till can cause poor conditions for crop growth like low spring temperatures and increased
    moisture, which promotes disease. Prescribed fire can leave bare soil vulnerable to erosion.

    The team focused the research on wheat and soybean rotations and
    continuous corn production systems. "These are common practices not only
    in the mid-south, but across many areas of the world," explains Fultz.

    "Wheat and corn production leave behind residue," she says. "Common
    practices, like conventional tillage, are highly disruptive. The need
    to identify viable conservation practices is growing in importance."
    Crop residue and its degradation by soil microbes is an important part
    of the carbon cycle. Plants store carbon during the growing season, then microbes use the plant residue for food. The carbon then gets stored in
    the soil in a chemically stable form.



    ========================================================================== "Fresh, green material in no-till fields is easy to breakdown and
    provides rich nutrients for soil microbes," says Fultz. "Ash from
    burned residue is more chemically stable, but it doesn't provide a
    nutrient source for microbes." The team found that impacts from crop management practices, like crop rotation or fertilization, outweighed
    the influence of prescribed fire for residue management. Researchers
    found some decreases in microbial activity after yearly prescribed burns.

    Findings show prescribed fire had some possible short-term benefits for
    soil nutrient availability, but timing is crucial. Prescribed burning of
    wheat residue provided an increase of nitrogen for about 7 days. These
    benefits should be weighed against other possible impacts, like carbon
    dioxide production and crop yield.

    We still need to learn the long-term influence of prescribed fire on the
    soil biological community," says Fultz. "While short-term impacts were measured, the long-term influence on soil nutrients, biological cycles and
    soil health are not known." No two farm management systems are the same,
    and their success is defined by the user. Scientists continue to examine possible scenarios to provide accurate and sustainable recommendations
    to farmers.

    "I have always been interested in soil conservation and the potential
    it has to impact many facets of life," says Fultz. "By improving soil
    health, we can improve air and water quality, store carbon, and provide
    stable resources for food production."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by American_Society_of_Agronomy. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Autumn Acree, Lisa M. Fultz, Josh Lofton, Beatrix Haggard. Soil
    biochemical and microbial response to wheat and corn stubble residue
    management in Louisiana. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment,
    2020; 3 (1) DOI: 10.1002/agg2.20004 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/06/200617091007.htm

    --- up 21 weeks, 1 day, 2 hours, 34 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)