• Hunting in savanna-like landscapes may h

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Jun 16 21:30:32 2020
    Hunting in savanna-like landscapes may have poured jet fuel on brain
    evolution
    Rife with obstacles and occlusions, terrestrial environments potentially helped give rise to planning circuits in the brain

    Date:
    June 16, 2020
    Source:
    Northwestern University
    Summary:
    Compared to the vast emptiness of open water, land is rife with
    obstacles and occlusions. By providing prey with spaces to hide
    and predators with cover for sneak attacks, the habitats possible
    on land may have helped give rise to planning strategies -- rather
    than those based on habit - - for many of those animals.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== [African savanna (stock | Credit: (c) Grispb / stock.adobe.com] African
    savanna (stock image).

    Credit: (c) Grispb / stock.adobe.com [African savanna (stock | Credit:
    (c) Grispb / stock.adobe.com] African savanna (stock image).

    Credit: (c) Grispb / stock.adobe.com Close Ever wonder how land animals
    like humans evolved to become smarter than their aquatic ancestors? You
    can thank the ground you walk on.


    ========================================================================== Northwestern University researchers recently discovered that complex
    landscapes -- dotted with trees, bushes, boulders and knolls -- might
    have helped land- dwelling animals evolve higher intelligence than their aquatic ancestors.

    Compared to the vast emptiness of open water, land is rife with obstacles
    and occlusions. By providing prey with spaces to hide and predators with
    cover for sneak attacks, the habitats possible on land may have helped
    give rise to planning strategies -- rather than those based on habit --
    for many of those animals.

    But the researchers found that planning did not give our ancestors the
    upper hand in all landscapes. The researchers' simulations show there
    is a Goldilocks level of barriers -- not too few and not too many --
    to a predator's perception, in which the advantage of planning really
    shines. In simple landscapes like open ground or packed landscapes like
    dense jungle, there was no advantage.

    "All animals -- on land or in water -- had the same amount of time
    to evolve, so why do land animals have most of the smarts?" asked Northwestern's Malcolm MacIver, who led the study. "Our work shows
    that it's not just about what's in the head but also about what's in
    the environment." And, no, dolphins and whales do not fall into the
    category of less intelligent sea creatures. Both are land mammals that
    recently (evolutionarily speaking) returned to water.



    ==========================================================================
    The paper will be published June 16 in the journal Nature Communications.

    It is the latest in a series of studies conducted by MacIver that
    advance a theory of how land animals evolved the ability to plan. In a follow-up study now underway with Dan Dombeck, a professor of neurobiology
    at Northwestern, MacIver will put the predictions generated by this computational study to the test through experiments with small animals
    in a robotic reconfigurable environment.

    MacIver is a professor of biomedical and mechanical engineering in Northwestern's McCormick School of Engineering and a professor of
    neurobiology in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. Ugurcan Mugan,
    a Ph.D. candidate in MacIver's laboratory, is the paper's first author.

    Simulating survival In previous work, MacIver showed that when animals
    started invading land 385 million years ago, they gained the ability to
    see around a hundred times farther than they could in water. MacIver hypothesized that being a predator or a prey in the context of being
    able to see so much farther might require more brain power than hunting
    through empty, open water. However, the supercomputer simulations
    for the new study (35 years of calculations on a single PC) revealed
    that although seeing farther is necessary to advantage planning, it's
    not sufficient. Instead, only a combination of long-range vision and
    landscapes with a mix of open areas and more densely vegetated zones
    resulted in a clear win for planning.



    ==========================================================================
    "We speculated that moving onto land poured jet fuel on the evolution
    of the brain as it may have advantaged the hardest cognitive operation
    there is: Envisioning the future," MacIver said. "It could explain why we
    can go out for seafood, but seafood can't go out for us." To test this hypothesis, MacIver and his team developed computational simulations to
    test the survival rates of prey being actively hunted by a predator under
    two different decision-making strategies: Habit-based (automatic, such
    as entering a password that you have memorized) and plan-based (imagining several scenarios and selecting the best one). The team created a simple,
    open world without visual barriers to simulate an aquatic world. Then,
    they added objects of varying densities to simulate land.

    Survival of the smartest "When defining complex cognition, we made
    a distinction between habit-based action and planning," MacIver
    said. "The important thing about habit is that it is inflexible and
    outcome independent. That's why you keep entering your old password for
    a while after changing it. In planning, you have to imagine different
    futures and choose the best potential outcome." In the simple aquatic
    and terrestrial environments examined in the study, survival rate was
    low both for prey that used habit-based actions and those that had the capability to plan. The same was true of highly packed environments,
    such as coral reefs and dense rainforests.

    "In those simple open or highly packed environments, there is no benefit
    to planning," MacIver said. "In the open aquatic environments, you just
    need to run in the opposite direction and hope for the best. While in
    the highly packed environments, there are only a few paths to take,
    and you are not able to strategize because you can't see far. In these environments, we found that planning does not improve your chances
    of survival." The Goldilocks landscape When patches of vegetation and topography are interspersed with wide open areas similar to a savanna,
    however, simulations showed that planning results in a huge survival
    payoff compared to habit-based movements. Because planning increases
    the chance of survival, evolution would have selected for the brain
    circuitry that allowed animals to imagine future scenarios, evaluate
    them and then enact one.

    "With patchy landscapes, there is an interplay of transparent and opaque regions of space and long-range vision, which means that your movement
    can hide or reveal your presence to an adversary," MacIver said. "Terra
    firma becomes a chess board. With every movement, you have a chance to
    unfurl a strategy.

    "Interestingly," he noted, "when we split off from life in the trees
    with chimpanzees nearly seven million years ago and quickly quadrupled
    in brain size, paleoecology studies point to our having invaded patchy landscapes, similar to those our study highlights, as giving the biggest
    payoff for strategic thinking." The study, "Spatial planning with long
    visual range benefits escape from visual predators in complex naturalistic environments," was supported by the National Science Foundation Brain Initiative (award number ECCS-1835389).


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Northwestern_University. Original
    written by Amanda Morris. Note: Content may be edited for style and
    length.


    ========================================================================== Related Multimedia:
    * YouTube_video:_Prehistoric_clutter_might_have_made_us_smarter ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Ugurcan Mugan, Malcolm A. MacIver. Spatial planning with long visual
    range benefits escape from visual predators in complex
    naturalistic environments. Nature Communications, 2020; 11 (1)
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467- 020-16102-1 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/06/200616083408.htm

    --- up 21 weeks, 2 hours, 34 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)