Supercomputing study breaks ground for tree mapping, carbon research
Date:
October 16, 2020
Source:
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
Summary:
A new method for mapping the location and size of trees growing
outside of forests helped scientists discover billions of trees
in arid and semi- arid regions and lays the groundwork for more
accurate global measurement of carbon storage on land.
FULL STORY ========================================================================== Scientists from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland,
and international collaborators demonstrated a new method for mapping
the location and size of trees growing outside of forests, discovering
billions of trees in arid and semi-arid regions and laying the groundwork
for more accurate global measurement of carbon storage on land.
========================================================================== Using powerful supercomputers and machine learning algorithms, the team
mapped the crown diameter -- the width of a tree when viewed from above --
of more than 1.8 billion trees across an area of more than 500,000 square miles, or 1,300,000 square kilometers. The team mapped how tree crown
diameter, coverage, and density varied depending on rainfall and land use.
Mapping non-forest trees at this level of detail would take months or
years with traditional analysis methods, the team said, compared to a
few weeks for this study. The use of very high-resolution imagery and
powerful artificial intelligence represents a technology breakthrough
for mapping and measuring these trees. This study is intended to be the
first in a series of papers whose goal is not only to map non-forest trees across a wide area, but also to calculate how much carbon they store --
vital information for understanding the Earth's carbon cycle and how it
is changing over time.
Measuring carbon in trees Carbon is one of the primary building blocks
for all life on Earth, and this element circulates among the land,
atmosphere, and oceans via the carbon cycle.
Some natural processes and human activities release carbon into the
atmosphere, while other processes draw it out of the atmosphere and store
it on land or in the ocean. Trees and other green vegetation are carbon "sinks," meaning they use carbon for growth and store it out of the
atmosphere in their trunks, branches, leaves and roots. Human activities,
like burning trees and fossil fuels or clearing forested land, release
carbon into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, and rising concentrations
of atmospheric carbon dioxide are a main cause of climate change.
Conservation experts working to mitigate climate change and other
environmental threats have targeted deforestation for years, but
these efforts do not always include trees that grow outside forests,
said Compton Tucker, senior biospheric scientist in the Earth Sciences
Division at NASA Goddard. Not only could these trees be significant
carbon sinks, but they also contribute to the ecosystems and economies
of nearby human, animal and plant populations. However, many current
methods for studying trees' carbon content only include forests, not
trees that grow individually or in small clusters.
========================================================================== Tucker and his NASA colleagues, together with an international team, used commercial satellite images from DigitalGlobe, which were high-resolution enough to spot individual trees and measure their crown size. The
images came from the commercial QuickBird-2, GeoEye-1, WorldView-2,
and WorldView- 3 satellites. The team focused on the dryland regions --
areas that receive less precipitation than what evaporates from plants
each year -- including the arid south side of the Sahara Desert, that
stretches through the semi-arid Sahel Zone and into the humid sub-tropics
of West Africa. By studying a variety of landscapes from few trees to
nearly forested conditions, the team trained their computing algorithms
to recognize trees across diverse terrain types, from deserts in the
north to tree savannas in the south.
Learning on the job The team ran a powerful computing algorithm called
a fully convolutional neural network ("deep learning") on the University
of Illinois' Blue Waters, one of the world's fastest supercomputers. The
team trained the model by manually marking nearly 90,000 individual
trees across a variety of terrain, then allowing it to "learn" which
shapes and shadows indicated the presence of trees.
The process of coding the training data took more than a year, said
Martin Brandt, an assistant professor of geography at the University of Copenhagen and the study's lead author. Brandt marked all 89,899 trees
by himself and helped supervise training and running the model. Ankit
Kariryaa of the University of Bremen led the development of the deep
learning computer processing.
"In one kilometer of terrain, say it's a desert, many times there are no
trees, but the program wants to find a tree," Brandt said. "It will find a stone, and think it's a tree. Further south, it will find houses that look
like trees. It sounds easy, you'd think -- there's a tree, why shouldn't
the model know it's a tree? But the challenges come with this level of
detail. The more detail there is, the more challenges come." Establishing
an accurate count of trees in this area provides vital information
for researchers, policymakers and conservationists. Additionally,
measuring how tree size and density vary by rainfall -- with wetter
and more populated regions supporting more and larger trees -- provides important data for on-the- ground conservation efforts.
========================================================================== "There are important ecological processes, not only inside, but outside
forests too," said Jesse Meyer, a programmer at NASA Goddard who led the processing on Blue Waters. "For preservation, restoration, climate change,
and other purposes, data like these are very important to establish a
baseline. In a year or two or ten, the study could be repeated with new
data and compared to data from today, to see if efforts to revitalize
and reduce deforestation are effective or not. It has quite practical implications." After gauging the program's accuracy by comparing it to
both manually coded data and field data from the region, the team ran
the program across the full study area. The neural network identified
more than 1.8 billion trees - - surprising numbers for a region often
assumed to support little vegetation, said Meyer and Tucker.
"Future papers in the series will build on the foundation of counting
trees, extend the areas studied, and look ways to calculate their
carbon content," said Tucker. NASA missions like the Global Ecosystem
Dynamics Investigation mission, or GEDI, and ICESat-2, or the Ice, Cloud,
and Land Elevation Satellite-2, are already collecting data that will
be used to measure the height and biomass of forests. In the future,
combining these data sources with the power of artificial intelligence
could open up new research possibilities.
"Our objective is to see how much carbon is in isolated trees in the
vast arid and semi-arid portions of the world," Tucker said. "Then we
need to understand the mechanism which drives carbon storage in arid and semi-arid areas. Perhaps this information can be utilized to store more
carbon in vegetation by taking more carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere." "From a carbon cycle perspective, these dry areas are not well mapped, in
terms of what density of trees and carbon is there," Brandt said. "It's
a white area on maps. These dry areas are basically masked out. This is
because normal satellites just don't see the trees -- they see a forest,
but if the tree is isolated, they can't see it. Now we're on the way to
filling these white spots on the maps. And that's quite exciting."
========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
NASA/Goddard_Space_Flight_Center. Original written by Jessica
Merzdorf. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Martin Brandt, Compton J. Tucker, Ankit Kariryaa, Kjeld Rasmussen,
Christin Abel, Jennifer Small, Jerome Chave, Laura Vang Rasmussen,
Pierre Hiernaux, Abdoul Aziz Diouf, Laurent Kergoat, Ole Mertz,
Christian Igel, Fabian Gieseke, Johannes Scho"ning, Sizhuo Li,
Katherine Melocik, Jesse Meyer, Scott Sinno, Eric Romero, Erin
Glennie, Amandine Montagu, Morgane Dendoncker, Rasmus Fensholt. An
unexpectedly large count of trees in the West African Sahara and
Sahel. Nature, 2020; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020- 2824-5 ==========================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201016132015.htm
--- up 7 weeks, 4 days, 6 hours, 50 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)