An unexpected origin story for a lopsided black hole merger
Researchers suggest a novel process to explain the collision of a large
black hole and a much smaller one
Date:
September 2, 2020
Source:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Summary:
A lopsided merger of two black holes may have an oddball origin
story, according to a new study.
FULL STORY ==========================================================================
A lopsided merger of two black holes may have an oddball origin story, according to a new study by researchers at MIT and elsewhere.
==========================================================================
The merger was first detected on April 12, 2019 as a gravitational wave
that arrived at the detectors of both LIGO (the Laser Interferometer Gravitational- wave Observatory), and its Italian counterpart,
Virgo. Scientists labeled the signal as GW190412 and determined that it emanated from a clash between two David-and-Goliath black holes, one
three times more massive than the other. The signal marked the first
detection of a merger between two black holes of very different sizes.
Now the new study, published today in the journal Physical Review
Letters, shows that this lopsided merger may have originated through
a very different process compared to how most mergers, or binaries,
are thought to form.
It's likely that the more massive of the two black holes was itself a
product of a prior merger between two parent black holes. The Goliath
that spun out of that first collision may have then ricocheted around
a densely packed "nuclear cluster" before merging with the second,
smaller black hole -- a raucous event that sent gravitational waves
rippling across space.
GW190412 may then be a second generation, or "hierarchical" merger,
standing apart from other first-generation mergers that LIGO and Virgo
have so far detected.
"This event is an oddball the universe has thrown at us -- it was
something we didn't see coming," says study coauthor Salvatore Vitale,
an assistant professor of physics at MIT and a LIGO member. "But nothing happens just once in the universe. And something like this, though rare,
we will see again, and we'll be able to say more about the universe."
Vitale's coauthors are Davide Gerosa of the University of Birmingham
and Emanuele Berti of Johns Hopkins University.
==========================================================================
A struggle to explain There are two main ways in which black hole mergers
are thought to form. The first is known as a common envelope process,
where two neighboring stars, after billions of years, explode to form
two neighboring black holes that eventually share a common envelope,
or disk of gas. After another few billion years, the black holes spiral
in and merge.
"You can think of this like a couple being together all their lives,"
Vitale says. "This process is suspected to happen in the disc of galaxies
like our own." The other common path by which black hole mergers form is
via dynamical interactions. Imagine, in place of a monogamous environment,
a galactic rave, where thousands of black holes are crammed into a small,
dense region of the universe. When two black holes start to partner up,
a third may knock the couple apart in a dynamical interaction that can
repeat many times over, before a pair of black holes finally merges.
In both the common envelope process and the dynamical interaction
scenario, the merging black holes should have roughly the same mass,
unlike the lopsided mass ratio of GW190412. They should also have
relatively no spin, whereas GW190412 has a surprisingly high spin.
==========================================================================
"The bottom line is, both these scenarios, which people traditionally
think are ideal nurseries for black hole binaries in the universe,
struggle to explain the mass ratio and spin of this event," Vitale says.
Black hole tracker In their new paper, the researchers used two models
to show that it is very unlikely that GW190412 came from either a common envelope process or a dynamical interaction.
They first modeled the evolution of a typical galaxy using STAR TRACK,
a simulation that tracks galaxies over billions of years, starting with
the coalescing of gas and proceeding to the way stars take shape and
explode, and then collapse into black holes that eventually merge. The
second model simulates random, dynamical encounters in globular clusters
-- dense concentrations of stars around most galaxies.
The team ran both simulations multiple times, tuning the parameters
and studying the properties of the black hole mergers that emerged. For
those mergers that formed through a common envelope process, a merger
like GW190412 was very rare, cropping up only after a few million
events. Dynamical interactions were slightly more likely to produce such
an event, after a few thousand mergers.
However, GW190412 was detected by LIGO and Virgo after only 50 other detections, suggesting that it likely arose through some other process.
"No matter what we do, we cannot easily produce this event in these more
common formation channels," Vitale says.
The process of hierarchical merging may better explain the GW190412's
lopsided mass and its high spin. If one black hole was a product of a
previous pairing of two parent black holes of similar mass, it would
itself be more massive than either parent, and later significantly
overshadow its first-generation partner, creating a high mass ratio in
the final merger.
A hierarchical process could also generate a merger with a high spin:
The parent black holes, in their chaotic merging, would spin up the
resulting black hole, which would then carry this spin into its own
ultimate collision.
"You do the math, and it turns out the leftover black hole would have
a spin which is very close to the total spin of this merger," Vitale
explains.
No escape If GW190412 indeed formed through hierarchical merging, Vitale
says the event could also shed light on the environment in which it
formed. The team found that if the larger of the two black holes formed
from a previous collision, that collision likely generated a huge amount
of energy that not only spun out a new black hole, but kicked it across
some distance.
"If it's kicked too hard, it would just leave the cluster and go into the
empty interstellar medium, and not be able to merge again," Vitale says.
If the object was able to merge again (in this case, to produce GW190412),
it would mean the kick that it received was not enough to escape the
stellar cluster in which it formed. If GW190412 indeed is a product of hierarchical merging, the team calculated that it would have occurred in
an environment with an escape velocity higher than 150 kilometers per
second. For perspective, the escape velocity of most globular clusters
is about 50 kilometers per second.
This means that whatever environment GW190412 arose from had an immense gravitational pull, and the team believes that such an environment could
have been either the disk of gas around a supermassive black hole, or a "nuclear cluster" -- an incredibly dense region of the universe, packed
with tens of millions of stars.
"This merger must have come from an unusual place," Vitale says. "As LIGO
and Virgo continue to make new detections, we can use these discoveries
to learn new things about the universe."
========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology. Original written by Jennifer
Chu. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Davide Gerosa, Salvatore Vitale, Emanuele Berti. Astrophysical
Implications of GW190412 as a Remnant of a Previous Black-Hole
Merger.
Physical Review Letters, 2020; 125 (10) DOI: 10.1103/
PhysRevLett.125.101103 ==========================================================================
Link to news story:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200902182442.htm
--- up 1 week, 2 days, 6 hours, 50 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)