• When calling loudly, echolocation is cos

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Mon Jul 13 21:30:36 2020
    When calling loudly, echolocation is costly for small bats

    Date:
    July 13, 2020
    Source:
    Forschungsverbund Berlin
    Summary:
    Calling in the ultrasonic range enables small bats to orient
    themselves in the dark and track down insects. Louder calls travel
    farther, improving a bat's ability to detect their prey. It was
    long assumed that echolocation does not contribute much to energy
    expenditure in flight because individuals couple their calls with
    the beat of their wings.

    Scientists have now shown that high intensity echolocation calls
    substantially contribute to energy expenditure.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Calling in the ultrasonic range enables small bats to orient themselves
    in the dark and track down tiny insects. Louder calls travel farther,
    improving a bat's ability to detect their prey. It was long assumed
    that echolocation does not contribute much to energy expenditure in
    flight because individuals simply couple their calls with the beat of
    their wings. Scientists at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife
    Research (Leibniz-IZW) in Berlin have now shown that high intensity echolocation calls are by no means free and substantially contribute to
    energy expenditure. Bats must therefore find a balance between energy expenditure and effective echolocation and use the latter economically.


    ==========================================================================
    For many animals, vocalisations are essential for survival. With
    their calls, roars, croaks, chirps or songs, animals attract potential
    mating partners, repulse competitors or locate prey. These sounds can
    be deafening. A bison, for instance, roars at up to 127 decibels (dB),
    some birds reach 132 dB and sea lions even manage 137 dB! For comparison:
    a sound pressure level of 110dB is equivalent to the sound of jet engine
    100m away. Despite their small size, bats can reach a sound pressure
    level of 137 dB, amongst the loudest animals in the world. But because
    of their high frequency, these sounds are inaudible to the human ear.

    In principle, generating a higher sound pressure level is associated
    with higher energy costs. If a bat in search of prey wants to increase
    the distance over which its echolocation travel, it has to call louder,
    which should cost more energy. Until now, the prevailing opinion amongst scientists was that, at least in flight, bats can boost the sound pressure level of their calls without additional energy expenditure. This is
    because they synchronize the contraction of the abdominal wall, necessary
    for sound production, with the contractions of the large, active flight
    muscles to generate echolocation calls. According to conventional wisdom,
    the pressure generated by the wing beat is sufficient to support the
    production of very loud echolocation. The energy expenditure of flying
    bats should therefore remain more or less the same, regardless of whether
    they call softly or loudly.

    A team of scientists from the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife
    Research (Leibniz-IZW) in Germany and Tel Aviv University in Israel has
    now shown that this is not the case. In their experiments, they allowed Nathusius' pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus nathusii) to fly freely in
    a wind tunnel under controlled conditions. Using loudspeakers, the
    researchers generated a loud background noise inside the tunnel. This encouraged the bats to drown out the noise with more intense echolocation calls. Before flying in the wind tunnel, the animals had received an
    isotonic solution of 13C-labelled sodium bicarbonate, which is exhaled
    as carbon dioxide during breathing, a proxy for metabolic rate. From the isotopic composition of the breathing air before and after the flight,
    the scientists determined the animals' energy expenditure when flying
    in the tunnel.

    "When bats were flying with only the noise from the wind tunnel,
    echolocation intensity was 113 dB on average" says Leibniz-IZW scientist Shannon Currie, joint first author of the study. "But when flying
    in background noise of 109dB, the bats increased their echolocation
    intensity to an average of 128 dB." Since the sound pressure level
    follows a logarithmic scale, the bat calls were actually 30 times
    (!) louder when there was a high background noise in the wind tunnel.

    This had significant effects on energy expenditure. Metabolic power
    rose by 0.12 watts when bats were calling 15 dB louder. If a bat were to maintain this high sound pressure level throughout a typical night-time foraging flight, it would have to catch about 0.5 grams of additional
    insect prey to compensate for the added energy expenditure, or one
    fourteenth of their own body mass. This is an enormous amount for an
    animal that itself weighs only seven grams.

    "Our study illustrates that in bats the coupling of the abdominal wall
    movement with the flight muscle contractions alone is not sufficient to
    produce very loud calls," explains Christian Voigt, head of the Department
    of Evolutionary Ecology at the Leibniz-IZW. "We therefore assume that
    with more intense echolocation, additional muscles must become active
    to support the production of sound. This clearly costs a great deal of
    energy -- especially above 130 dB.

    A bat in search of prey cannot increase at will the intensity and thus
    the distance over which its calls range. Instead, it must use loud calls economically and find a good compromise between the associated energy expenditure and the efficiency of echolocation."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Forschungsverbund_Berlin. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Shannon E. Currie, Arjan Boonman, Sara Troxell, Yossi Yovel,
    Christian C.

    Voigt. Echolocation at high intensity imposes metabolic
    costs on flying bats. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020; DOI:
    10.1038/s41559-020-1249-8 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200713133456.htm

    --- up 24 weeks, 6 days, 2 hours, 34 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)