A few days ago, I discovered diode.io

It's yet-another messaging app that boasts privacy and
security.

It has DT and mobile app versions.



--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: fsxnet/2 (21:3/110.10)

A few days ago, I discovered diode.io

It's yet-another messaging app that boasts privacy and

Haven't seen it... hope it's a good system for you, glad you monumented it here.

N2QFD{Queen City BBS}:// "Does this need to be said? Does this need to be said by me? Does this need to be said by me right now?" - Craig Ferguson

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Queen City BBS (21:1/154)

On 18 Sep 2024 at 09:48p, Ogg pondered and said...

A few days ago, I discovered diode.io

It's yet-another messaging app that boasts privacy and
security.

Have not seen this one, but will have a look also thanks.

Kerr Avon [Blake's 7] 'I'm not expendable, I'm not stupid and I'm not going' avon[at]bbs.nz | bbs.nz | fsxnet.nz

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

I took a look at the "How it works" area and this is what I found:

" Fleet Contracts are the basic security perimeter element of the Diode Network - every Client must belong to at least one Fleet Contract so that the network can provision communications. Zones are a special type of Fleet Contract that are used by people and businesses to ring fence operations - including the operation of other Fleet Contracts."

It's a no from me. There are plenty of ways to send a private message without needing a blockchain.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
* Origin: The Bottomless Abyss BBS * bbs.bottomlessabyss.net (21:1/172)

Hello Ariadne!

** On Monday 23.09.24 - 11:08, Ariadne wrote to Ogg:

I took a look at the "How it works" area and this is what I found:

" Fleet Contracts are the basic security perimeter element of the Diode Network - every Client must belong to at least one Fleet Contract so that the network can provision communications. Zones are a special type of
Fleet Contract that are used by people and businesses to ring fence operations - including the operation of other Fleet Contracts."

It's a no from me. There are plenty of ways to send a private message without needing a blockchain.

Yes.. there seems to be some heavy background action going on.
I was just curious what a $100/mo system boasting security and
privacy looks like. It seems bloated and sometimes unreliabein
whatever it's doing. I can't believe they have a minimum $100/
mo price on that.

It also sounds like all nodes become part of a transfer system
whether you like it or not.




--- OpenXP 5.0.58
* Origin: Ogg's WestCoast Point (21:4/106.21)

I took a look at the "How it works" area and this is what I found:

" Fleet Contracts are the basic security perimeter element of the Diode Ne - every Client must belong to at least one Fleet Contract so that the netw can provision communications. Zones are a special type of Fleet Contract t are used by people and businesses to ring fence operations - including the operation of other Fleet Contracts."

It's a no from me. There are plenty of ways to send a private message with needing a blockchain.

Yeah, cryptoshit is an automatic "avoid at all costs" for me.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Archaic Binary * bbs.archaicbinary.net (21:2/132)

halian wrote to Ariadne <=-

It's a no from me. There are plenty of ways to send a private message with needing a blockchain.

Yeah, cryptoshit is an automatic "avoid at all costs" for me.

I think we need to ditch it all and go back to gpg for email privacy.
Ditch social media-based comms. Treat any other third party comms as potentially compromised.

I miss the days when I had mixed cleartext and encrypted email sitting
on an encrypted volume on my home server.



"We cannot have a society, in which, if two people wish to communicate
the only way that can happen is if it's financed by a third person who
wishes to manipulate them."

--Jaron Lanier


--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: realitycheckBBS.org -- information is power. (21:4/122)