If someone has time and is a NET 1 member can you try polling 21:1/100 using port 24554 instead of 24556 and let me know how that works out.
You should be able to use either agency.bbs.nz or net1.fsxnet.nz and in theory hit the mailer without needing port 24556 in your address now.
Avon wrote to All <=-
If someone has time and is a NET 1 member can you try polling 21:1/100 using port 24554 instead of 24556 and let me know how that works out.
You should be able to use either agency.bbs.nz or net1.fsxnet.nz and in theory hit the mailer without needing port 24556 in your address now.
I don't get any linked echos from your node, but connection looks good. 24554 and 24556 are the same binkd?
You should be able to use either agency.bbs.nz or net1.fsxnet.nz and theory hit the mailer without needing port 24556 in your address now.
If we are using 24556 do we need to change it?
If someone has time and is a NET 1 member can you try polling 21:1/100 using port 24554 instead of 24556 and let me know how that works out.
You should be able to use either agency.bbs.nz or net1.fsxnet.nz and in theory hit the mailer without needing port 24556 in your address now.
Avon wrote to All <=-
If someone has time and is a NET 1 member can you try polling 21:1/100 using port 24554 instead of 24556 and let me know how that works out.
You should be able to use either agency.bbs.nz or net1.fsxnet.nz and in theory hit the mailer without needing port 24556 in your address now.
I don't get any linked echos from your node, but connection looks good. 24554 and 24556 are the same binkd?
You should be able to use either agency.bbs.nz or net1.fsxnet.nz and theory hit the mailer without needing port 24556 in your address now.
If we are using 24556 do we need to change it?
Sysop: | CyberNix |
---|---|
Location: | London, UK |
Users: | 22 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 02:13:48 |
Calls: | 892 |
Files: | 4,436 |
Messages: | 669,104 |