Wow, that's quite the jump in version numbers. What about it makes it
so much better in your view?
apam wrote to All <=-
Also discovered a new (ish - as in newer than 90s lol) band called
Gojira, which I've been enjoying listening to.
Wow, that's quite the jump in version numbers. What about it makes it
so much better in your view?
They just dropped of the 3. from the version number I think.
I wouldn't say it's so much better, but it just feels more usable. Still not as usable as xfce or something like that, but more usable than 3.xx
Oli wrote to apam <=-
I tried a Debian 11 live image with the newest XFCE and was
disappointed about the GUI inconsistencies. Old XFCE style combined
with the weird Gnome 3 file dialog.
Am currently in Fedora 34-beta, I installed it the other day on a spare hard drive so I have dual boot. Windows needed to reboot and I forgot and left it, and so it booted into fedora. It's nice, gnome 40 is definatly better than gnome 3.xx.
Nearly dinner time.
Wow, that's quite the jump in version numbers. What about it makes it
so much better in your view?
apam wrote to All <=-
Also discovered a new (ish - as in newer than 90s lol) band called
Gojira, which I've been enjoying listening to.
Wow, that's quite the jump in version numbers. What about it makes it
so much better in your view?
They just dropped of the 3. from the version number I think.
I wouldn't say it's so much better, but it just feels more usable. Still not as usable as xfce or something like that, but more usable than 3.xx
Oli wrote to apam <=-
I tried a Debian 11 live image with the newest XFCE and was
disappointed about the GUI inconsistencies. Old XFCE style combined
with the weird Gnome 3 file dialog.
Sysop: | CyberNix |
---|---|
Location: | London, UK |
Users: | 22 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 05:40:55 |
Calls: | 892 |
Files: | 4,436 |
Messages: | 669,142 |