John Dovey Firecat wrote to All <=-
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me much
John Dovey Firecat wrote to All <=-
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me muchWhat was deleted? No context given, nothing quoted. Nobody knows what you're referring to. At least it doesn't bother you though.
... Can you tell me how to get, how to get to Sesame Street?
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
John Dovey Firecat wrote to All <=-
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me muchWhat was deleted? No context given, nothing quoted. Nobody knows what you're referring to. At least it doesn't bother you though.
... Can you tell me how to get, how to get to Sesame Street?
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
If you reply via Telegram to a message that has an image attached, on the Telegram group it looks fine, but on the Fido side the reply is posted as a message to "All" without the image URL and no quoted text.
The @REPLY kludge is ok, however, so if your editor supports thread linking you can find the replied-to message.
Stas said he would fix this, but it seems he hasn't been able to do it yet.
When replying to normal text-only messages tg_BBS does a good work.
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me much
What was deleted? No context given, nothing quoted. Nobody knows what you're referring to. At least it doesn't bother you though.
John Dovey Firecat wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me much
What was deleted? No context given, nothing quoted. Nobody knows what you're referring to. At least it doesn't bother you though.
Interestingly, I replied to a message from August on Telegram and
he knew exactly what I was referring to.
Carlos Navarro wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me much
What was deleted? No context given, nothing quoted. Nobody knows what you're referring to. At least it doesn't bother you though.
If you reply via Telegram to a message that has an image
attached, on the Telegram group it looks fine, but on the Fido
side the reply is posted as a message to "All" without the image
URL and no quoted text.
The @REPLY kludge is ok, however, so if your editor supports
thread linking you can find the replied-to message.
Stas said he would fix this, but it seems he hasn't been able to
do it yet.
When replying to normal text-only messages tg_BBS does a good
work.
Mike Powell wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
Yeah. Deleted from his database. Doesn't bother me much
What was deleted? No context given, nothing quoted. Nobody knows what you're referring to. At least it doesn't bother you though.
I figured it out because I saw it posted in the ELIST echo. The
ELIST is about to delist this echo.
John Dovey Firecat wrote to Carlos Navarro <=-T
If you reply via Telegram to a message that has an image attached, on the
elegram group it looks fine, but on the Fido side the reply islinking
posted as a message to "All" without the image URL and no quoted
text.
The @REPLY kludge is ok, however, so if your editor supports thread
you can find the replied-to message.yet.
Stas said he would fix this, but it seems he hasn't been able to do it
When replying to normal text-only messages tg_BBS does a good work.
Thanks Carlos. I simply don't have the desire or energy to argue
with people about the effectiveness of software as compensation
for poor design. Stas has done a great job. It works pretty well
as it is as long as the software you're using isn't completely
braindead
John Dovey Firecat wrote to Carlos Navarro <=-
If you reply via Telegram to a message that has an image attached, on theT
elegram group it looks fine, but on the Fido side the reply is
posted as a message to "All" without the image URL and no quoted
text.
The @REPLY kludge is ok, however, so if your editor supports threadlinking
you can find the replied-to message.
Stas said he would fix this, but it seems he hasn't been able to do ityet.
When replying to normal text-only messages tg_BBS does a good work.
Thanks Carlos. I simply don't have the desire or energy to argueThe braindead software in this discussion is the Telegram garbage. Regular methods of writing/reading to/from FidoNet echos work just fine, as they always have.
with people about the effectiveness of software as compensation
for poor design. Stas has done a great job. It works pretty well
as it is as long as the software you're using isn't completely
braindead
You remind me of an "eternal-September" type of Usenet poster. Pfffftttt. ... This MSG written by pouring warm tea on an Ouija board.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
John Dovey Firecat wrote to Dan Clough <=-
John Dovey Firecat wrote to Carlos Navarro <=-
If you reply via Telegram to a message that has an image attached, on theT
elegram group it looks fine, but on the Fido side the reply is
posted as a message to "All" without the image URL and no quoted
text.
The @REPLY kludge is ok, however, so if your editor supports threadlinking
you can find the replied-to message.
Stas said he would fix this, but it seems he hasn't been able to do ityet.
When replying to normal text-only messages tg_BBS does a good work.
Thanks Carlos. I simply don't have the desire or energy to argueThe braindead software in this discussion is the Telegram garbage.
with people about the effectiveness of software as compensation
for poor design. Stas has done a great job. It works pretty well
as it is as long as the software you're using isn't completely
braindead
Regular methods of writing/reading to/from FidoNet echos work just fine, as they always have.
You remind me of an "eternal-September" type of Usenet poster. Pfffftttt. ... This MSG written by pouring warm tea on an Ouija board.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
And you remind me why Fido is essentially dead.
John Dovey Firecat wrote to Dan Clough <=-
T
linking
yet.
The braindead software in this discussion is the Telegram garbage.
Regular methods of writing/reading to/from FidoNet echos work just fine,
as they always have.
You remind me of an "eternal-September" type of Usenet poster. Pfffftttt.
... This MSG written by pouring warm tea on an Ouija board.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
And you remind me why Fido is essentially dead.Well, see there above? It *IS* possible (apparently) for the braindead "app" to quote context. I guess it must just be braindead *people* who *choose* to not quote. Right? I mean, there it is, right there above, although quite sloppy/messy looking.
As for Fido, yes, it's *popularity / usage* has declined, which is not unexpected with the changes over the years (i.e. - Internet access). That
wasn't the point, though. The *mechanisms* for exchanging messages continues to work just fine, unlike this kludge/garbage "app" junk that you think is an enhancement or something. It isn't. It's crap.
... Do you know where you are?
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Sysop: | CyberNix |
---|---|
Location: | London, UK |
Users: | 22 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 119:55:21 |
Calls: | 892 |
Files: | 4,398 |
Messages: | 664,401 |