Just a restatement of what I had asked in IRC:
10:55 < khelair> msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a preferred method of accessing
what the last_msg or last_read pointer might be for the mail
sub, is it?
11:07 < khelair> would I be correct in assuming that the Mail sub, in the
standard shell, utilizes the applicable message header
attributes to glean where the unread ones are at?
though I misphrased it pretty poorly at the beginning. What I meant to say was 'If msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a potential method of accessing the last_msg or last_read pointers, then would I be correct in assuming that the mail sub, in the standard shell, utilizes applicable message header attributes to clean where the unread ones are at?
| Sysop: | CyberNix |
|---|---|
| Location: | London, UK |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 69:35:49 |
| Calls: | 914 |
| Files: | 5,566 |
| D/L today: |
71 files (9,992K bytes) |
| Messages: | 823,642 |