How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one place instead of having them separate.
How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one
place instead of having them separate.
Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.
have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 02:06 pm
Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.
--
digital man (rob)
Synchronet "Real Fact" #49:
Synchronet program was named 'sbbs' instead of 'sync' to avoid conflict w/Unix Norco, CA WX: 66.1°F, 33.0% humidity, 11 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to The Millionaire on Wed May 11 2022 04:40 pm
How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one
place instead of having them separate.
Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.
I might be remembering wrong, but I think this question had come up before. I thought the reason for having them separate was that some sysops might choose not to add any FTN networks, so it might not make sense to have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm
Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.
SCFG on the other hand is not optional, as it modifies binary configuration (.cnf) files which you can't practically do by hand. SCFG also creates/updates database files and just generally does a lot more than echocfg does.
--
digital man (rob)
Synchronet "Real Fact" #91:
Captured chat with Wayne Bell: http://wiki.synchro.net/history:waynebell_chat Norco, CA WX: 61.1°F, 35.0% humidity, 7 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm
Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.
SCFG on the other hand is not optional, as it modifies binary configuration (.cnf) files which you can't practically do by hand. SCFG also creates/updates database files and just generally does a lot more than echocfg does.
Most BBSes DM have their ECHOCFG in their CFG file. Lots of examples: RA, Ezycom, Mystic, Renegade, etc.
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 08:13 pm
EchoCfg is a FidoNet (FTN) EchoMail and Mailer configuration program for Synchronet's SBBSecho. Most of your cited example BBS programs don't even include an FTN EchoMail or Mailer.
--
digital man (rob)
Synchronet "Real Fact" #5:
Synchronet version 3 for Win32 development began in 1999
Norco, CA WX: 58.0°F, 39.0% humidity, 2 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
EchoCfg is a FidoNet (FTN) EchoMail and Mailer configuration program for
Synchronet's SBBSecho. Most of your cited example BBS programs don't even
include an FTN EchoMail or Mailer.
And neither did Synchronet at one time have a mailer.
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 09:57 am
Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.
Nightfox
---
â– Synchronet â– Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 09:57 am
Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.
Well you still would need ECHOCFG for an external mailer but now that Synchronet has an internal mailer, no external mailer is needed.
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Thu May 12 2022 03:24 pm
You don't technically "need" echocfg at all, but if you're going to use SBBSecho as your echomail program, then it's a nice thing to have/use. There used to be a lot more options for FTN echomail programs to be used with Synchronet/SMB (in which case, echocfg would not be relevant), but those other options have all pretty much dried up. Still, it's conceivable that someone could use a different EchoMail program than SBBSecho and a different mailer than BinkIt, in which case, they would have no use for echocfg or sbbsecho/sbbsecho.ini.
--
digital man (rob)
Breaking Bad quote #27:
Other than Gomey here pees sitting down, here's what we know. - Hank Schrader Norco, CA WX: 83.3°F, 13.0% humidity, 6 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly
*need* EchoCfg.
On Wed, 11 May 2022 19:44:55 -0700
"Digital Man" <digital.man@VERT> wrote:
Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in scfg" or something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa. At least you wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like just another option.
Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on. :)
--
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
---
â– Synchronet â– End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Thu May 12 2022 03:24 pm
You don't technically "need" echocfg at all, but if you're going to use SBBSecho as your echomail program, then it's a nice thing to have/use. There used to be a lot more options for FTN echomail programs to be used with Synchronet/SMB (in which case, echocfg would not be relevant), but those other options have all pretty much dried up. Still, it's conceivable that someone could use a different EchoMail program than SBBSecho and a different mailer than BinkIt, in which case, they would have no use for echocfg or sbbsecho/sbbsecho.ini.
Fmail aka Fast Echomail Processor went back into production with a different author now. That would work with Synchronet?
On Wed, 11 May 2022 19:44:55 -0700
"Digital Man" <digital.man@VERT> wrote:
Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.
Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in scfg" or something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa. At least you wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like just another option.
Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on. :)
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to All on Thu May 12 2022 07:47 pm
Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript *module* options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
--
digital man (rob)
Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls. Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Nelgin wrote to All <=-
Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly
*need* EchoCfg.
Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in
scfg" or something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa.
At least you wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like
just another option. Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on.
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to All on Thu May 12 2022 07:47 pm
Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript *module* options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
--
digital man (rob)
Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls. Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
The Millionaire wrote to Nightfox <=-
Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.
Well you still would need ECHOCFG for an external mailer
but now that Synchronet has an internal mailer, no external
mailer is needed.
The Millionaire wrote to Digital Man <=-*module*
Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript
options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P
*module*
Except.... you don't.
... Behind every great man is an amazed mother-in-law!
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make
conversation. <shrug>
My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P
Except.... you don't.
is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
Or.... just ignore the issue completely, and move on. The dude doesn't
even use SBBS...
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 20:14:00
I like that option more.
---
â– Synchronet â– End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 20:14:00
I like that option more.
That makes two of us.
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 12:37 pm
So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.
Is that about right?
You are one strange person.
---
â– Synchronet â– Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
I like that option more.
That makes two of us.
So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to The Millionaire on Fri May 13 2022 05:50 pm
I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*
Nightfox
---
â– Synchronet â– Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 12:37 pm
So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.
Is that about right?
You are one strange person.
You are one strange person too. Downvoting every message I write.
Asking me to go on your bbs is the last thing I'd ever do.
I treated you pretty decently on my Fido echo area titled "Mobile".
You still treat me like crap on FSX and DOVE-NET. Which I don't
think is very much fair to me. :-(
You didn't answer the question I asked you above. Why not?
I've told you in the past why I downvote (most) of your messages. I'll continue to do so as long as you continue to do what you do in regards
to up-voting.
I don't recall asking you to "go on my BBS".
I don't recall that either, and it doesn't even really make sense.
I don't "treat you like crap". I ask you questions sometimes about your statements/questions, and you almost always don't bother answering. If
you do respond it's about something else, completely un-related and irrelevant. I'll keep trying, though.
... As a matter of fact, it IS a banana in my pocket.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
â– Synchronet â– Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*
That makes the two of us. :-)
The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-
I don't recall asking you to "go on my BBS".
You were talking about Trump's app on Mobile.
You even told me that you carried the ftn echo area on your bbs.
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to The Millionaire on Fri May 13 2022 05:50 pm
I like that option more.
That makes two of us.
So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.
I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*
My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 06:30 pm
"great" ?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
DaiTengu
... Among economists, the real world is considered to be a special case.
---
â– Synchronet â– War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com
The Millionaire wrote to DaiTengu <=-
"great" ?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Making great conversation is a skill that I have learned over the
years and I think I perfected it quite nicely I would say so
myself. :-)
"great" ?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think itMaking great conversation is a skill that I have learned over the years and I think I perfected it quite nicely I would say so myself. :-)
means.
How did you do in your grade-school English classes?
... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
â– Synchronet â– Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-
How did you do in your grade-school English classes?
Better than you.
English was my third language not first.
Remember that one. :-)
I don't think you could possibly know that for a fact.
Really? What were the first two?
Sure will.
... So easy, a child could do it. Child sold separately.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-
Really? What were the first two?
Russian and German.
Holy crap, you actually answered a question.
That's pretty cool, though. Were you Russian-born, and then lived in
Germany and later Canada?
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
â– Synchronet â– Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-
That's pretty cool, though. Were you Russian-born, and then lived in Germany and later Canada?
I was born in California but came to Canada speaking Russian at
home, English at school and my relatives speaking German.
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm
have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P
That wasn't a serious request; I'm happy with where things are at in SCFG and echocfg currently.
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 18:17:35
is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
He seems to leave that sort of mess all over the place.
and did conversation starters and why don't you's. his name was finnigan.
Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:51 pm
it's always seemed weird that there is an echocfg separate from scfg.
i know it has many more options added to it now, but i think it should all go under one roof.
---
â– Synchronet â– ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: MRO to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 08:30 am
and did conversation starters and why don't you's. his name was finnigan.
I think I remember Finnigan! I haven't seen many of the crew who were around back when my board was last up, though. I remember I used to enjoy scrapping with Angus McCleod a bit.
o
(O)
i'm not sure what happened to mr netfoot. i think he tried to erase himself off the internet. maybe digitalman knows what happened to him.
Angus is still above ground and flying planes. I plan to see him some time t
i'm not sure what happened to mr netfoot. i think he tried to erase
himself off the internet. maybe digitalman knows what happened to
him.
Angus is still above ground and flying planes. I plan to see him some
time this year.
| Sysop: | CyberNix |
|---|---|
| Location: | London, UK |
| Users: | 18 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 52:46:48 |
| Calls: | 819 |
| Files: | 3,532 |
| Messages: | 556,922 |